Laserfiche WebLink
9 FINDINGS REGARDING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES <br />Table 9-1: Summary Comparison of the Impacts of the Alternatives provides, in summary format, <br />a comparison between the level of impacts for each alternative and the Project. In addition, Table <br />9-2: Summary Comparison of the Alternatives' Ability to Meet Project Objectives provides a <br />comparison of the ability of each of the alternatives to meet the objectives of the Project. <br />9.2.1 Alternative 1: No Project/No Build <br />Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e), the EIR is required to evaluate and <br />analyze the impacts of a No Project Alternative. When the project is the revision of an existing <br />land use or regulatory plan, policy, or ongoing operation, the No Project Alternative includes what <br />would be reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the project were not approved, <br />based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services. <br />Further, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(3)(B) states, "In certain instances, the no <br />project alternative means 'no build' wherein the existing environmental setting is maintained." In <br />addition, the No Project/No Build Alternative includes what would be reasonably expected to occur <br />in the foreseeable future if the project were not approved, based on current plans and consistent <br />with available infrastructure and community services. <br />Therefore, under this alternative, no new development would occur on the project site, and the <br />site would remain in its existing condition as the South Coast Plaza Village with seven existing <br />buildings, totaling approximately 164,049 square feet of existing commercial retail uses, with <br />surface parking and landscaping. In this alternative scenario, the seven buildings are assumed to <br />be fully operational as a shopping plaza with multiple retail uses, a restaurant, and a movie <br />theater. (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 6-7.) <br />Environmental Effects: The No Project/No Build Alternative would result in the continued <br />operation of the existing South Coast Plaza Village, containing seven commercial buildings, <br />surface parking, and landscaping. Development and operation of the proposed mixed -use <br />development would not occur. As a result, the No Project/No Build Alternative would result in <br />reduced impacts related to construction and operation compared to the Project and would not <br />require the mitigation measures related to air quality, cultural resources, geology and soils, noise, <br />and tribal cultural resources. However, the benefits of the Project would also not occur, including <br />implementation of the GPU South Bristol Street Focus Area objectives; improvements to roadway, <br />pedestrian, bicycle infrastructure; low impact development (LID) -compliant infrastructure <br />improvements; provision of housing within a Transit Priority Area (TPA); and improvements to the <br />jobs/housing balance. Further, the No Project/No Build Alternative would not build out the GPU's <br />DC-5 designation as a major development activity area and anchor to the City's commercial <br />corridors and would not implement the GPU South Bristol Street Focus Area vision and objectives, <br />or the SCAG policies promoting high -density, infill development. This alternative also would not <br />assist in the improvement of the job/housing balance or reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT). <br />Therefore, this alternative would not be consistent with the GPU and would not implement the <br />City's land use plan to the same extent as the Project. Impacts under the No Project/No Build <br />Alternative related to land use would be greater than the less -than -significant impacts of the <br />Project. Generally, the impacts of the No Project/No Build Alternative would be less in severity <br />than those of the Project and would not require implementation of mitigation measures, with the <br />exception of land use and planning; however, this alternative would not implement the benefits <br />resulting from the Project. (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 6-8 — 6-13.) <br />City of Santa Ana The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />August 2025 CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />9-4 <br />