My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
09/16/2025
>
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2025 9:35:07 AM
Creation date
9/10/2025 8:39:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 NO ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT <br />ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WITHOUT MITIGATION MEASURES <br />Explanation of the Rationale: <br />Fire Protection <br />Buildout of the GPU and the related projects would be reviewed by the City and/or OCFA prior to <br />permit approval to ensure that all new development implement fire protection design features <br />pursuant to the CFC and CBSC to reduce potential fire hazards. In addition, each related project <br />proposing buildings over two stories in height would be required to pay a fire facilities fee. The <br />Project would be consistent with the land use designations evaluated in the GPU PEIR; thus, no <br />new substantial unplanned growth would occur that was not previously analyzed in the GPU <br />PEIR. Further, Project implementation would improve the fire safety of the project site compared <br />to existing conditions and adhere to OCFA's Fire Prevention Guideline B-09. The Project would <br />also contribute the appropriate payment of the fire facilities fee, residential development tax, and <br />property taxes, which would contribute to the City's general fund that could potentially be used for <br />the expansion of existing fire stations or construction new fire protection facilities. Therefore, the <br />Project's contribution to cumulative impacts associated with fire protection and emergency <br />services would not be cumulatively considerable, and therefore, cumulative impacts would be less <br />than significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.11-20 — 4.11-21.) <br />Police Protection <br />Buildout of the GPU and related projects within the City of Santa Ana would have the potential to <br />generate additional demand for police protection services by the Santa Ana Police Department. <br />However, as part of the development project review process, the Santa Ana Police Department <br />would review and approve the final site plans for GPU buildout and each related project within the <br />City. In addition, GPU buildout and each related project within the City would generate revenues <br />to the City's general fund (in the form of property taxes, sales tax, etc.) that could be applied <br />toward the provision of new police facilities and related staffing in the City. The Project would not <br />result in substantial unplanned population growth that was not previously analyzed in the GPU <br />PEIR. Design of the Project would be reviewed and approved by the Santa Ana Police <br />Department, and the Project would generate revenues for the City's general fund that could be <br />used for the provision of new police facilities in the City. Therefore, the Project's contribution to <br />cumulative impacts associated with police protection services would not be cumulatively <br />considerable, and therefore, cumulative impacts to police protection services would be less than <br />significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 4.11-21.) <br />School Services <br />Buildout of the GPU and related projects within the boundaries of Santa Ana Unified School <br />District and Orange Unified School District have the potential to result in the need for additional <br />school resources. However, cumulative development would be subject to all applicable laws, <br />ordinances, and regulations in place for school services, such as payment to fund new schools <br />from the fee program pursuant to Senate Bill 50. Additionally, the Project would be consistent with <br />the land use designations proposed in the GPU PEIR; thus, no new substantial unplanned growth <br />would occur that was not previously analyzed in the GPU PEIR. Additionally, the Project would <br />be required to pay developer/impact fees pursuant to Senate Bill 50. As such, the Project's <br />contribution to cumulative impacts associated with school services would not be cumulatively <br />considerable, and therefore, cumulative impacts to school services would be less than significant. <br />(Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.11-21—4.11-22.) <br />City of Santa Ana The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />August 2025 CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />4-33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.