My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Responses to CEQA Related - Agenda Item No. 28
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
09/16/2025
>
Staff Responses to CEQA Related - Agenda Item No. 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2025 4:37:50 PM
Creation date
9/16/2025 4:37:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />RESPONSES TO COMMENTS <br />This document provides responses to environmental-related comments in a series of nearly <br />identical comment letters that the City of Santa Ana received from the following individuals in <br />advance of the City Council’s consideration of the proposed Village Santa Ana Specific Plan <br />Project (Project): <br /> Gabrielle Ridley <br /> Damaris Solis <br /> Vanessa Chavez <br /> Yuri Lara <br /> Randee Tejeda <br /> Sarah Meza <br /> Nicole Ortega <br /> Cenorino Gomez <br /> Julio Castillo <br /> Ricardo Cárdenas <br />These comment letters note that hotels would be an allowed use under the proposed Specific <br />Plan and assert that hotel uses were not evaluated as part of the environmental review for the <br />project. See the response to the UNITE HERE Local 11 comment letter. In particular, section III <br />of that response explains that the Project’s Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) <br />appropriately studied the Project as contemplated by the Proposed Specific Plan. <br /> <br />City of Santa Ana September 2025 <br /> <br />1 <br />55394.00067\\44182451.1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.