Item 14 - Appropriation Adjustment and Agreement for Safe Routes to Parks and Wheelchair Assesment Plan

Home Browse Search

11 of 18 ARTICLE 6 SPECIAL GRANT TERMS 6.1 SS4A funds must be expended within five years after the grant agreement is executed and DOT obligates the funds, which is the budget period end date in section 10.3 of the Terms and Conditions and section 2.4 in this agreement. 6.2. The Recipient demonstrates compliance with civil rights obligations and nondiscrimination laws, including Titles VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and accompanying regulations. Recipients of Federal transportation funding will also be required to comply fully with regulations and guidance for the ADA, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and all other civil rights requirements. 6.3 SS4A Funds will be allocated to the Recipient and made available to the Recipient in accordance with FHWA procedures. 6.4 The Recipient of a Planning and Demonstration Grant acknowledges that the City of Santa Ana Safe Routes to Parks and Wheelchair Assessment Plan will be made publicly available and agrees that it will publish the final City of Santa Ana Safe Routes to Parks and Wheelchair Assessment Plan on a publicly available website. 6.5 The Recipient of a Planning and Demonstration Grant that involves a demonstration activity agrees to provide an assessment of each demonstration activity and update the existing Action Plan, which will incorporate the information gathered in the Action Plan’s list of projects or strategies and/or inform another part of the existing Action Plan. The Recipient also agrees that demonstration activities are temporary in nature and must be removed and/or ended following the conclusion of the project if the assessment of the demonstration activities does not affirm that the activities provide safety benefits. 6.6 Pursuant to the court’s preliminary injunction order in State of California v. Duffy, 1:25-cv-00208-JJM- PAS (D.R.I.) (June 19, 2025), DOT will not impose or enforce the challenged immigration enforcement condition* or any materially similar terms and conditions, to any grant funds awarded, directly or indirectly, to Plaintiff States or local government entities within those States (collectively referred to as “Plaintiff State Entities”), or otherwise rescind, withhold, terminate, or take other adverse action, absent specific statutory authority, based on the challenged immigration enforcement condition while DOT is subject to an injunction. DOT will not require Plaintiff State Entities to make any certification or other representation related to compliance the challenged immigration enforcement condition nor will DOT construe acceptance of funding from DOT as certification as to the challenged immigration enforcement condition. *The challenged immigration enforcement condition: “[T]he Recipient will cooperate with Federal officials in the enforcement of Federal law, including cooperating with and not impeding U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other Federal offices and components of the Department of Homeland Security in the enforcement of Federal immigration law.” 6.7 There are no other special grant requirements.