Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> E ' <br /> SECTION 7 — CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FAILURES & LACK OF <br /> MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> The project was approved without adequate conditions of approval, safeguards, operational <br /> limits, or monitoring requirements to ensure protection of the adjacent R-1 residence and <br /> surrounding neighborhood. Conditions of Approval exist to prevent or minimize foreseeable <br /> impacts by imposing enforceable limitations and mitigation measures. The absence of such <br /> conditions — particularly in light of expanded institutional use, increased activity, and the <br /> presence of protected residents — resulted in an approval lacking the basic protections <br /> necessary for compatibility and public welfare. <br /> 7.1 No Enforceable Limitations Placed on Enrollment Growth or Operational <br /> Expansion <br /> Although the applicant stated that enrollment would not exceed 195 students, no enforceable <br /> condition was adopted to ensure adherence to this representation. Without a binding <br /> enrollment cap, ongoing expansion remains possible without further review, allowing intensity <br /> to increase beyond what was presented to the Commission. <br /> - The absence of an enrollment limit exposes adjacent residents to unmitigated growth in <br /> traffic, noise, parking demand, and daily student activity, and removes a critical safeguard <br /> that should have been included as a condition of approval. <br />, <br /> 7.2 No Mitigation Measures to Address Noise Lighting_,_Traffic, Privacy_, or After- <br /> Hours Use <br /> t <br /> The project was approved without any conditions requiring noise mitigation, lighting controls, <br /> 4 - privacy screening, or time-of-day restrictions, despite the well-documented adjacency to an <br /> h R-1 residence and the increase in institutional use. <br /> li Reasonable conditions that should have been considered include, but are not limited to: <br /> I <br /> f <br /> Limits on amplified sound and outdoor activity hours <br /> • Shielded lighting and directional fixtures to prevent spillover <br />€ • Landscape or structural buffering for privacy and noise reduction <br /> • Restrictions on evening, weekend, and non-school use adjacent to the residence <br /> No such conditions were imposed, leaving the most affected property without basic <br /> protections. <br /> 7.3 No Monitoring, Reporting., or Review Mechanisms Imposed <br /> I <br />{ Conditions of Approval typically include periodic review, compliance monitoring, or corrective <br /> mechanisms to ensure ongoing adherence. The project approval did not include: <br /> - • Annual or periodic compliance review <br /> • Mechanisms to address complaints or violations <br /> Enforcement provisions or corrective action triggers. <br /> r <br /> 19 <br /> I <br /> City Council 18 — 35 2/3/2026 <br /> i <br />