My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 18 - Appeal Application of Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Expansion of a Private School
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
02/03/2026
>
Item 18 - Appeal Application of Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Expansion of a Private School
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2026 10:11:01 AM
Creation date
1/28/2026 10:09:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
18
Date
2/3/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appeal Application No. 2025-02 – Forty Martyrs Armenian Church Middle School (5311 <br />W. McFadden Avenue) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Exhibit 6 – Response to Appeal Comments <br />Page 14 of 19 <br />stating that cumulative impact analysis is required only when a project may <br />contribute to a cumulatively considerable significant environmental impact. If a <br />project’s contribution to cumulative impacts is not cumulatively considerable, no <br />further cumulative analysis is required. <br /> <br />As proposed, the project does not have cumulative impacts that are considerable <br />and qualifies for an exemption from further CEQA review pursuant to CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15314 (Class 14). Class 14 exempts minor additions to existing <br />schools from CEQA review when the addition does not increase original student <br />capacity by more than 25 percent or ten classrooms, whichever is less. <br /> <br />The proposed school expansion would result in an eight percent increase in <br />student enrollment and includes a total of five new classrooms, which is well within <br />the thresholds established under the Class 14 exemption. As a result, the project <br />is exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report, and <br />the lead agency is therefore not required to certify an EIR for this project. <br /> <br />As previously stated, the City’s review of a new development project is limited to <br />evaluating the proposed project itself and ensuring that it meets all applicable <br />federal, state, and local laws. <br /> <br />9. Appellant Request: Failure to Consider Feasible or Less Intrusive Alternatives <br /> <br />Analysis of Issue: <br /> <br />Projects that are categorically exempt from further environmental analysis are not <br />required to prepared alternative design or site plan analysis. Furthermore, as <br />previously stated and discussed in the Planning Commission staff report and <br />resolution (Exhibit 3 to the February 3, 2026 City Council staff report), the project <br />undergoes a development project review where City staff ensures compliance with <br />Federal, State, and City codes. As such, staff must ensure that the project <br />complies with zoning regulations, which require compliance with development <br />standards including, but not limited to the following: <br />• Setbacks from property lines <br />• Adequate landscape <br />• Design quality <br />• Building Height <br /> <br />The proposed project’s location, lot configuration, proximity to residential <br />properties, and existing construction limit the options available to construct the <br />desired addition to the school. Reconfiguring the floor plan of the existing school <br />building would not be a feasible option, as the project is responsible for compliance <br />with Chapter 3 Occupancy Classification and Use) of the California Building Code
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.