Laserfiche WebLink
I SECOND CAUSE ACTION <br /> 2 <br /> RETALIATION IN VIOLATION F THE <br /> 3 <br /> 4 FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSINGCT <br /> 5 (Against rest All DEFENDANTS) <br /> 116. MORE NO realleges Paragraphs 1 through 115 above and incorporates same as though fully <br /> 7 <br /> set forth herein. <br /> g <br /> 9 117. Section 12940,et.seq.of the California Government Codernakes itunlawful for an employer <br /> 10 to retaliate against and/or harass an employee in "terms, conditions or privileges ofemployment" because <br /> 11 oftheir protected status. The Fair Employment and Housing Act("FEED.")protects, not only employees <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br /> who make a FEHAr claim,but also,those who oppose acts made unlawful by the statute and/or testify,assist <br /> 1 or participate in any manner in proceedings or hearings. <br /> 15 118. MORENO was treated differently because of his protected status [ i.e., `opposing"", <br /> 16 5`assisting" or"participating" in others' FEHA cases) by DEFENDANTS. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 <br /> 119. As a direct and legal result of the retaliation MORENO suffered due to his protected status, <br /> 19 MONO suffered harm and injury that was legally (proximately) caused by the conduct of <br /> 20 DEFENDANTS.NTS. Said harm and injury includes,but is not limited to,special(economic)damages,general <br /> 1 (non-economic)damages,attorneys'fees[per Government Code§12965(b)],litigation costs,future damages <br /> 22 <br /> 2and past damages, lost economic earning capacity in future employment endeavors and such further relief <br /> 24 as shown at the time of Trial and in excess of the minimal jurisdictional of this Court. <br /> 25 120. In addition to the damages sought above, as a proximate result of'D Fp.NRANTS' actions <br /> 26 as alleged above,MORENO will also seek all damages allowed by the Code.Government Code, §129C5(c)_ <br /> 27 <br /> Pfl <br /> 21 <br /> 20 <br /> COMAW <br />