My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - CS Item No. 3
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
04/07/2026 Regular
>
Correspondence - CS Item No. 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2026 8:31:56 AM
Creation date
4/2/2026 8:28:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"Instead,lite incident was documented in a cursory fashion and did not rise to the <br /> attention of the Department's command staff. Yhefailure of the handling officer to notify his <br /> chain of command about the allegations received was a serious misstep that also should have <br /> been considered as part of the eventual administrative investigation that did occur". <br /> "As a result(and in conjunction with the handling officer's relegation of the incident to "call <br /> notes, "SAPD's command staff was not formally and contemporaneously apprised of file <br /> incident and allegations. Had that occurred, the retrieval ofsurveillance video from the <br /> restaurant and the pursuit of other investigative leads would obviously have been more <br /> effective". <br /> "...Had an investigation been initiated more promptly, relevant evidence would have been, <br /> more readily available. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> In the INTRODUCTIONAND BACKGROUND portion of the Assessment report the Office of <br /> Independent Review made the following statement: <br /> "OIR Group had full access to, both completed investigations and was able to make informed <br /> judgments about their adequacy; the findings listed below are accompanied by systemic <br /> recommendations for improving SAPD administrative processes in the future. " <br /> Up until the Office of Independent Review published the Assessment, I believed that SAPD's <br /> Internal Affairs Investigation would account and accurately explain the seven-month gap from <br /> when misconduct was reported(August 2020)to DC Rodriguez to when SAID received the <br /> anonymous complaint(—March 2021). <br /> It is my belief that if the Office of Independent Review, was made aware that Commander <br /> Alvarez and I had indeed followed SAPD policy/procedure, with regards to the reporting of <br /> officer misconduct, they would not have made some of the assertions and recommendations they <br /> did. Additionally,had an Internal Affairs Investigation been initiated in August of 2020 instead <br /> of 7 months later, our Internal Affairs Unit would have had the ability to conduct a more <br /> thorough and accurate investigation. This 7-month delay impeded and interfered with the alleged <br /> sexual assault and Internal Affairs investigation. <br /> On 4/11/23, 1 met with DC Rodriguez and we discussed the OIR's Assessment report. DC <br /> Rodriguez did not deny that I had reported misconduct to him shortly after the Culichi Town <br /> incident. I asked him why an Internal Affairs investigation was not immediately started. DC <br /> Rodriguez stated that the reason he did not initiate an investigation was because I had not <br /> followed the proper SAPD protocol of completing a BLUETEAM entry about the incident.I <br /> asked DC Rodriguez if he had told Chief Valentin about the misconduct I had reported. DC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.