My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 27
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
04/21/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Correspondence - Item 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2026 9:45:17 AM
Creation date
4/20/2026 2:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />white zip codes.3 Similarly, in the District of Columbia, where photo enforcement accounts for 96 percent <br />of citations and 97 percent of fines, drivers in Black-segregated areas were over seventeen times more <br />likely to receive a moving violation than drivers in white-segregated areas.4 This reflects a clear trend <br />amongst automated enforcement mechanisms, they are routinely found to disproportionately target and <br />ticket drivers in Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) neighborhoods. <br /> <br />This is especially important given the City’s recent adoption of Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) <br />technology through Flock. As the City considers additional automated enforcement tools, it is essential to <br />evaluate the full impact of these technologies and ensure they align with the City’s values and <br />commitments to protecting our most vulnerable communities. <br />Importantly, there are proven, non-surveillance alternatives to improve traffic safety. Measures such as <br />speed humps, raised crosswalks, bulb-outs, lane reductions, chicanes, and roundabouts can effectively <br />slow traffic and improve safety without relying on data collection or enforcement technology. The City <br />has invested in these types of infrastructure improvements and should continue to. We support <br />improvements that make streets safer for all users, especially pedestrians and cyclists. <br />It is critical that the City take a more deliberate and community centered approach before providing <br />direction that would advance the establishment of a Speed Safety Pilot Program. We respectfully urge the <br />Council to direct staff to: <br />● Conduct comprehensive research on how other cities have implemented AB 645, including <br />timelines, costs, outcomes, and any challenges or unintended consequences. <br />● Engage in robust community outreach, particularly with immigrant communities and those <br />most likely to be impacted, before pursuing legislative changes. <br />● Determine the fiscal impact of such a Program, its funding source, its feasibility and priority <br />with Measure X beginning to sunset April 1, 2029. The Council needs to be wary of <br />expenditures that may outlast revenue. <br />We ask that the Council pause on advancing this resolution and instead prioritize research, transparency <br />and community engagement. <br />Best, <br /> <br />Ivon Pena, <br />Executive Director <br />4 William Farrell, “Predominately Black Neighborhoods in D.C. Bear the Brunt of Automated Traffic Enforcement,” <br />D.C. Policy Center, June 28, 2018, <br />https://www.dcpolicycenter.org/publications/predominately-black-neighborhoods-in-d-c-bear-the-brunt-of-automate <br />d-traffic-enforcement/ (accessed April 21,2023). <br />3 Emily Hopkins and Melissa Sanchez, “Chicago’s Race Neutral Traffic Cameras Ticket Black and Latino Drivers <br />the Most,” ProPublica, January 11, 2022, <br />https://www.propublica.org/article/chicagos-race-neutral-traffic-cameras-ticket-black-and-latino-drivers-the-most <br />(accessed April 21, 2026). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.