My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 27
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
04/21/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Correspondence - Item 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2026 9:45:17 AM
Creation date
4/20/2026 2:04:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />As to camera placement, Figure 9 shows that although LMI zip codes made up <br />only 43% of Chicago’s zip codes, 54% of Chicago’s speed cameras were located in <br />those zip codes. Similarly, Figure 10 shows that although minority zip codes made <br />up 50% of Chicago’s zip codes, 59% of Chicago’s speed cameras were located <br />there. <br />It is also important to note that even if the placement of ticketing cameras and the <br />number of tickets issued were equal between minority and non-minority <br />communities, or between lower-income and higher-income communities, these <br />tickets would still have a disparate impact on the city’s most vulnerable residents. <br />It is well known that lower-income and minority communities are more likely to <br />be financially burdened by these types of tickets. According to the Woodstock <br />Institute study, tickets issued to drivers from LMI and minority zip codes were
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.