My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 12 - Select Locally Preferred Alternative for the First Street Multimodal Boulevard Study
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
05/05/2026 Regular, HA
>
Item 12 - Select Locally Preferred Alternative for the First Street Multimodal Boulevard Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2026 11:42:36 AM
Creation date
4/29/2026 11:38:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Public Works
Item #
12
Date
5/5/2026
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
First Street Multimodal Boulevard Study <br /> February 17, 2026 <br /> Page 4 <br /> EXISTING CONDITIONS AND KEY FINDINGS <br /> A walk audit was conducted, along with traffic modeling, origin-destination travel pattern <br /> analysis, safety analysis, and an in-depth assessment of existing pedestrian, bicycle, <br /> and transit conditions to establish the existing conditions of the First Street corridor. <br /> An equity assessment was also completed as part of this analysis. The following <br /> presents a high-level overview of the existing conditions analysis. Additional <br /> information, including methodology, data, and other detail can be found in the Technical <br /> Memorandum (Exhibit 2). <br /> Key multimodal findings include: <br /> • Continuous sidewalks exist, but widths are often constrained and crossings are <br /> infrequent; <br /> • No continuous, protected bicycle facilities currently exist, resulting in widespread <br /> sidewalk riding; <br /> • Posted speeds of 40-45 mph are incompatible with the surrounding land uses <br /> and pedestrian activity; <br /> • Signalized crossings are spaced far apart, creating barriers between north—south <br /> neighborhoods; <br /> • Existing tree canopy is inconsistent with limited access to shade; <br /> • Bus stops lack dedicated shelter lighting, wayfinding signage, and real-time <br /> arrival displays; <br /> • Pedestrian and bicycle crashes account for approximately 23% of all reported <br /> collisions—significantly higher than typical for similar arterials. <br /> Figure 3: Key Findings <br /> • <br /> �olii�iona <br /> 0 O onrirrA sw <br /> 92J73 " <br /> Walking 250+ Bikes per <br /> 30%of Trips Day Travel E/W <br /> Along Corridor 85%on Sidewalk 071! <br /> Key findings from the existing traffic operations analysis include: <br /> • Daily traffic volumes generally operate at level of service (LOS) C or better; <br /> • Intersections operate at LOS D or better under existing conditions; <br /> • Excessive speeds outside peak hours are common and strongly correlated with <br /> severe crashes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.