My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 22 - Approve Adjustments & CIP Amendment, & Agreements with Mark Thomas, So Cal Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), the U.S. Department of Transportation, & Caltrans for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project (No. 26-6718)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
05/05/2026 Regular, HA
>
Item 22 - Approve Adjustments & CIP Amendment, & Agreements with Mark Thomas, So Cal Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), the U.S. Department of Transportation, & Caltrans for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project (No. 26-6718)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2026 1:39:30 PM
Creation date
4/30/2026 8:07:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Public Works
Item #
22
Date
5/5/2026
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT 2 <br /> The Consultant shall perform all research of private development plans adjacent to or affecting <br /> the Project site, as necessary,to secure the information,clearances,and/or plan review services <br /> required to identify, locate, and accurately layout all of the above underground improvements <br /> and easements, centerline, ROW, and private property lines. The selected Consultant shall be <br /> expected to determine what data sources are necessary to gather and by what date, and to <br /> prioritize the gathering of that data. Consultant shall research and review all previous work <br /> performed to date in the Project vicinity that impacts the design of the improvements,including <br /> but not limited to: <br /> • Existing improvement plans/engineering reports of record <br /> • Right-of-way mapping, ownership records (Title Reports) <br /> • Preliminary engineering and reports for this Project <br /> • Environmental clearance and mitigation measures <br /> • City/other agency engineering design standards, codes, and plan processing procedures <br /> • Existing topographic mapping, photos, reports, maintenance reports, "as-built" plans, <br /> record maps and surveys, study reports, assessor maps, contract documents, utility <br /> index maps, local street improvement/development plans and other pertinent data shall <br /> be obtained and reviewed. <br /> In case of conflict, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors, or omissions among the reference <br /> materials obtained by Consultant from other agencies, Consultant shall submit the matter to <br /> City for clarification. Any work affected by such conflicts, ambiguities, discrepancies, errors <br /> or omissions which is performed by Consultant prior to clarification by City shall be at <br /> Consultant's risk and expense. In event that non-standard features become apparent during the <br /> initial design, Consultant shall prepare the necessary design exceptions following Caltrans or <br /> SCRRA and the respective city's guidelines. <br /> The Consultant shall positively locate all, both high- and low-risk (pothole) utilities in <br /> conformance with Government Code 4216 to determine the depth and size for clearance and <br /> connection points or conflicts for any underground improvements, such as gas lines and <br /> services, electrical lines and services, signal, street lighting, communication lines and services, <br /> sewer lines and services, storm drains, or potable and non-potable water lines and services. <br /> The Consultant shall submit to each utility company a preliminary set of plans that provide the <br /> location, elevation of the utility, and the elevation of the improvement, with the conflict area <br /> clouded to show the utility companies the areas of conflict with the proposed improvement. <br /> Potholing information and plan shall be submitted to the City after completion of this task. If <br /> an area of possible conflict was not potholed during the project design phase and the City <br /> determines that additional potholing is required, the Consultant shall pothole the area to verify <br /> any conflicts at no additional cost to the City. Consultant and Subconsultants shall obtain <br /> necessary training including applicable rail safety program prior to performing field <br /> investigations. All said training shall be at the sole cost of the Consultant and at no additional <br /> cost to the City. <br /> The City expects that the selected team shall make the best use of existing data to minimize <br /> waste and duplication of work efforts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.