My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
32A - DENSITY BONUS EDWARD PADILLA JR
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
09/07/2010
>
32A - DENSITY BONUS EDWARD PADILLA JR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:01:00 PM
Creation date
9/1/2010 4:14:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
32A
Date
9/7/2010
Destruction Year
2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DBA 2010-01 and TTM 2009-01 <br />August 9, 2010 <br />Page 4 <br />City of Santa Ana Permitted Densities <br />No. of units allowed under LR-7 General Plan 2 <br />No. of units allowed under R2 Zoning 4 <br />No. of units proposed 5 - 20% increase from zoning/250% increase <br />from GP <br />Because the City's existing Density Bonus Law has not been amended to comply with the most <br />current State Density Bonus Law and because the SAMC states that it shall be in compliance with <br />the State law "as it may be amended from time to time," the provisions of the State law will take <br />precedence in this case. The State law and the SAMC state that "density bonus" means a density <br />increase over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the applicable zoning <br />ordinance and land use element of the general plan. State law, however, does not interpret the <br />granting of a density bonus in excess of the density found within the agency's General Plan to <br />constitute inconsistency with the General Plan. The City's Zoning and General Plan land use <br />designations for this property are inconsistent with each other. As such, staff finds that the density <br />provisions of the R2 zone are the most appropriate to apply in this case, which results in an <br />effective density increase of 20 percent. <br />Under State Law, in order to be eligible for this density increase, the applicant must provide a <br />minimum of 10 percent of the units to Lower income households. In this case, the applicant will be <br />providing one unit, or 20 percent, of the proposed development to a low income household, which <br />is in excess of the minimum requirement. <br />The applicant is also requesting two deviations from the development standards to facilitate the <br />construction of the affordable unit. The R2 zoning district establishes a minimum lot area for lots <br />containing two or more dwellings. It requires 6,000 square feet for the first unit, and 3,000 square <br />feet for each additional unit. Since the lot is 16,879 square feet, a total of four units are allowed. A <br />lot size of 18,000 square feet would be required to construct five units. The applicant is requesting <br />a deviation from the minimum lot size of 18,000 square feet for five units, to 16,879 square feet - a <br />reduction of 1,121 square feet. The R2 zone requires that no more than two dwelling units, other <br />than townhouses, be attached together. The applicant could have developed this site using the <br />Townhouse standards, but these are intended for much larger developments and would have been <br />incompatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. The applicant is requesting a <br />deviation from this standard to allow three units, rather than two, to be attached. <br />With the approval of the two deviations requested by the applicant, the project will comply with all <br />applicable development standards established in the R2 zoning district and the Citywide Design <br />Guidelines. Additionally the project will be consistent with the purpose of the General Plan Land <br />Use Element, as it will further the goals and policies of the plan and not obstruct their attainment. <br />Specifically, it would further the following General Plan Land Use Element goals and policies: <br />32A-6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.