Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION: Adopt a resolution approving amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. <br />1990-01 as conditioned. <br />MOTION: Betancourt <br />VOTE: AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />ABSENT: <br />SECOND: De La Torre <br />Benavides, Betancourt, Cribb, De La <br />Lutz (7) <br />None (0) <br />None (0) <br />None (0) <br />Torre, Gartner, Leo, <br />2. Public Comments (for items not on the agenda) <br />Reverend Will B. King voiced dissatisfaction with issuance of too many alcoholic <br />licenses. <br />STAFF AND COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />3. Staff Comments <br />No comments were made. <br />4. Planning Commission Comments <br />Commissioner Benavides <br />• No comments <br />Commissioner Cribb <br />• Expressed concern with minimal landscaping at Grand/17th Streets, <br />with the Red Mountain project. Recommended returning item to Planning <br />Commission for further discussion. <br />• Recommended discussion at Planning Commission regarding <br />intersections; important to come before Planning Commission as a <br />matter of policy. <br />• Requested review of development at 314 Summer Lane, located on the <br />west side of Newhope and Fifth Streets. <br />• Reported graffiti at Campesino Park entrance on Seventh Street on pylon, <br />also indicated that the landscape was not well applied to the project. <br />• Indicated lack of pedestrian access to shopping center from the cross <br />walk on Bristol/Memory Lane on the east/west side. <br />• Thanked Planning Manager for discussion on green building design. <br />Vice Chair De La Torre <br />• Thanked Planning Manager for discussion on green building design. <br />Commissioner Betancourt <br />• Thanked Planning Manager for green building design discussion; <br />suggested sending staff to Denver workshop "Green Build 06". <br />• Recommended that Global Green consultants conduct an overview from <br />other cities and provide input for the Planning Commission. <br />• Agreed with Mr. Hostetter whereby he cautioned not to build green at <br />expense of aesthetics materials but should be reviewed by engineers and <br />companies that are technology driven. <br />Planning Commission Minutes 6 October 23, 2006 <br />