Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 12 Responses to Comments Received Since Publication of the t=tnal EIR <br /> Response to Comment AQMD-3 <br /> This comment requests that the Cit<- provide AQNID with written responses to the comments set forth <br /> <br /> in this letter prior to certification of the EIR for this project. The City will provide the AQMD with a <br /> <br /> written response to these comments before the public hearing on the project. <br /> Response to Comment AQMD-4 <br /> Refer to response r1MQD-2. <br /> Response to Comment AQMD-5 <br /> The commenter states that the City should consider developing criteria to determine the "availability", <br /> "cost effectiveness", and/or "feasibility" of the use of construction methods or equipment that would <br /> help to reduce construction-related pollutant emissions. Since this programmatic EIR is analyzing long- <br /> range future development, it is not feasible to determine the criteria that the commenter suggests. <br /> Technologies change as do costs. As indicated in the l~~ZRP prepared for the project, future entitlements <br /> by the City prior to the issuance of grading or building permits will be required. Therefore, the <br /> appropriateness of these measures can better be determined at such time. Thus, the Cite does not <br /> consider the development of these criteria to be feasible mitigation at the time of this writing. <br /> Response to Comment AQMD-6 <br /> The commenter suggests several additional mitigation measures. The first suggestion is to re-route <br /> construction equipment away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas. IV~74.2-15 sets forth <br /> mitigation to ensure smooth traffic flow. Also, in the FEIR, the following text change was added to the <br /> Transportation Section: <br /> In addition, any work that proposes to excavate, improve, or otherwise occur in a public street <br /> sidewalk. or amr odler public place will be reduired to obtain a permit from die Public Works <br /> Department. One of die reduirements to obtain a permit as outlined in Section 33-32(a (71 of die <br /> Municipal Code is die preparation of a construction work flan that is approved by die Cit<r Traffic <br /> Engineer. This includes identif<rin~ lane closures, their duration, die means for traffic safety <br /> control, die tees and number of traffic delineators, schedule, hours of operation, etc. Compliance <br /> with the City`s Noise Ordinance and the Municipal Code will prevent anv significant impacts to <br /> local roadwa~-s or on die nearbt- school. <br /> Attainment of the aforementioned permit will require a construction work plan as stated above. The <br /> provisions thereof will ensure that the City Traffic Engineer will grant a permit at which time traffic <br /> disruption is determined to be at the minimum possible levels. <br /> In regard to the other suggested mitigation measures, as is standard practice, the City included the <br /> mitigation measures that are listed in the URBEMIS model since they are calculated into the "mitigated" <br /> model output. <br /> However, the CitcT concurs and will add the following mitigation measures to reduce Impact 4.2-5, <br /> <br /> identified in Section 4.2 of the DEIR although the reductions (if any=) are not quantifiable. <br /> 12-8 City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) EIR <br /> <br />