My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2010-08-16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
08/16/2010
>
FULL PACKET_2010-08-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2016 3:13:06 PM
Creation date
10/19/2010 4:44:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
8/16/2010
Destruction Year
2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />JULY 2010 FIRST STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />Type of Equipment <br />Range of Maximum Sound <br />Levels Measured (dBA at <br />50 feet) <br />Suggested Maximum Sound <br />Levels for Analysis <br />dBA at 50 feet <br />Hydraulic excavators <br />81-90 <br />86 <br />Graders <br />79-89 <br />86 <br />Air compressors <br />76-89 <br />86 <br />Trucks <br />81-87 <br />86 <br />Source: Noise Control for Buildings and Manufacturing Plants, Bolt, Beranek & Newman (1987). <br />dBA = A -weighted decibels <br />ft-lb/blow= foot-pounds per blow <br />The closest sensitive receptor locations are located approximately 50 ft from the new sound barrier <br />construction areas. These receptor locations may be subject to short-term noise exceeding acceptable <br />levels (91 dBA L.x) generated by construction activities along the project alignment. However, as <br />provided in the X "A" the construction activities will be limited to the allowed hours and with <br />incorporation of Mitigation Measure N-1, noise related impacts will be reduced to less than <br />significant levels. <br />E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been <br />adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people <br />residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? <br />No impact. The proposed project is not located near an airport and would not be affected by any land <br />use or noise regulations associated with an airport because the project site is 8 miles from John <br />Wayne Airport (Thomas Bros Maps, Orange County Street Guide, 2007, p. 828 J-3, p. 829 A-3). No <br />impact is anticipated, and no mitigation is required. <br />I. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or <br />working in the project are to excessive noise levels. <br />No impact. The proposed project is not located near a private airstrip and would not be affected by <br />any land use or noise regulations associated with the operation of a private airstrip (General Plan, <br />Airport Environs Element, 1987). No impact is anticipated, and no mitigation is required. <br />XII. Population and Housing <br />Would the project: <br />A. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing <br />new homes and business) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other <br />infrastructure)? <br />No impact. The project is already developed with commercial and residential land uses, as shown on <br />Figure 2 of Section 2.0. The proposed project will not change or add any new land use type on the <br />site. <br />07/25/10 «P:\DMJ0701\MND\4.0 Environmental Analysis.doc» <br />411"M:n <br />4-33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.