2004-28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

feature that historically separates this residential style from • other historical styles in Southern California. 2. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The denial of this minor exception impacts the rights of the property owners to enhance and enjoy the use of their property in an outdoor setting. The proposed private courtyard area would also add the amenity of additional useable open space for the enjoyment of the property owners. Many homes, particularly of this architectural style and with a particularly large lot size, utilize the front yard area as private open space. The owner of this home wishes to enhance the look of the home as well as create an enjoyable outdoor setting. 3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. The project will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare because the fence design is harmonious with the existing architectural style of the house and is in keeping with the quality of the surrounding properties. Goal 2.7 of the Urban Design Element states that projects must exhibit a • functional, comfortable scale in relation to the neighborhood. This proposal is in scale with existing structures in the neighborhood. 4. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The requested minor exception will not adversely affect the General Plan, as it has a positive impact on the goals and policies expressed in that document. Goal 3.5 of the Urban Design Element Policy Plan encourages residential alterations that are consistent with the architectural character of the neighborhood. The proposed courtyard is consistent with the architectural style of this residence and with the architectural quality of this historically significant neighborhood. D. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project is categorically exempt. Environmental Review No. 2004-169 will be filed for this project. Section 2. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the public hearing hereby approves Minor Exception No. 2004-04. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes but not is not limited to: the Request for Zoning Administrator Action dated August 11, 2004 and Resolution No. 2004-28 Page 2 of 3