My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-40
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
PLANNING COMMISION
>
2002
>
2002-40
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:56:06 PM
Creation date
11/4/2010 3:29:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
VA02-12
Date
11/25/2002
Notes
3300 S Bristol St
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2002-40 <br />Kdo/11 /27/02 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DENYING <br />VARIANCE NO. 2002-12 AS CONDITIONED FOR <br />THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3300 SOUTH <br />BRISTOL STREET <br />BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF <br />SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: <br />Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby <br />finds, determines and declares as follows: <br />A. Variance No. 2002-12 came before the Planning Commission of the <br />City of Santa Ana for a duly noticed public hearing on November <br />25, 2002. <br />B. The Planning Commission determines that the following findings, <br />which must be established in order to grant a variance from the <br />• provisions of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, -have not been <br />established: <br />That because of special circumstances applicable to the <br />subject property, including size, shape, topography, location, <br />or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning <br />ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of <br />privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent and <br />purpose of the provisions of this chapter. <br />There are no special circumstances applicable to the <br />subject property. The variance to allow two cabinet <br />wall signs on the east and south elevation is not <br />necessary in order to allow this property to be utilized <br />in a manner that is consistent with similar surrounding <br />commercial uses. <br />2. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the <br />preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial <br />property rights. <br />The granting of the variance for wall signs is not <br />necessary to preserve property rights, as the tenant <br />• will maintain the ability to install channel letter wall <br />Resolution No. 2002-40 <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.