My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10A - 10-18-10 MINUTES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
11/15/2010
>
10A - 10-18-10 MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:57:38 PM
Creation date
11/10/2010 11:27:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
10A
Date
11/15/2010
Destruction Year
2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Which Technologies Are Most Suitable? <br /> PERSONAL Desd LOW4WMM GOAL43AB®CIUTEM RAPT MONORAIL NNJN~ C~ LIGHTRAL Bus 7ROLLJIVKA ~MODERN <br /> RN <br /> TRANSIT MAC Lev LIYABIJ TYfACCFSSIBIIJTY_ <br /> Does the project promote livability <br /> andvA&abdW. Does it utilize Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br /> clean fuels? Does it reduce auto <br /> dependency? <br /> PROM FEASMJTY: <br /> Is the technology proven in revenue Net M41 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br /> service in the US? <br /> AFFORDAMLITY: <br /> Can the project be ba esed d on nted at <br /> treasonable' <br /> a cost ba No No you Yes you Yes Yes Yes <br /> possible, known funding sources? <br /> ACCESS eTf: <br /> Does the project provide the <br /> required level of accessibility ? me No 1b no ft Yes Yes Yes Yes <br /> Does it address identified travel <br /> markets and creeds? <br /> COMMUNITY ACCE:PTANCrJ <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: <br /> Does the project avoid major right- Ile me No No Nr me Yes Yes Yes <br /> all y in mach ? Can it operate in <br /> existing lanes? <br /> How Well Does Each Alignment Perform? <br /> ALTERNATIVES EVALUATED <br /> Wit` 5 <br /> VOrriERML Jill *0111111 77 <br /> ST*K Alternative provides service to City's 0% 29.8% 33.9% 27.0% 29.5% <br /> adopted transit corridors Number of residents within a 1/4 mile <br /> walking distance of proposed alignment (in 43 43 45 42 42 <br /> thousands) <br /> Number of employees within a 1/4 mile <br /> walking distance of proposed alignment (in 26 27 27 26 25 <br /> thousands) <br /> Would promotes principles of "Livability" Logy Low High High High <br /> Would serve transit-supportive land use Low Medium-High High Medium-High Medium <br /> Will be perceived as a significant long-term <br /> public investment in infrastructure by Medium Medium High High High <br /> potential investors/developers <br /> Total estimated capital cost Lowy Lowy Medium Medium Medium <br /> RECOMMENDED RANKING 5th 4th 1st 2nd 3rd <br /> Top Technology Being Considered <br /> ? Modern Streetcar <br /> Runs in street traffic or in exclusive guideway <br /> Electrically powered through single overhead wire <br /> Typical Vehicle Capacity: 50 seated, up to 100 standing <br /> Reduced Set of Alternatives <br /> ? No Build Alternative <br /> Depicts what happens if project is not built <br /> - No further transportation improvements beyond what has <br /> already been funded and committed through the year 2035. <br /> CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 19 OCTOBER 18, 2010 <br /> 1 0A-19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.