Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />16. Clarify walls and landscape treatment along northern property line. <br />17. Clarify the uses permitted, should be similar to Main Street Lofts and <br />Santiago Lofts. <br />18. Need explanation as to where the parking is intended to be for the Lofts. <br />19. Require further detail of area between Lofts and surface parking. Also <br />require landscape plans. <br />20. Page 28, glass door fronts shall be facing all streets, clarify if opaque or <br />clear glass will be used. <br />21. Phasing of construction should be identified. <br />22. Require further explanation as to what types of signs will be permitted and <br />where. Reference signage plan on page 51, does this apply to Lofts or <br />just retail? <br />23. The proposed conditions of approval related to the interior of the building <br />being submitted for review prior to building permits, advise timeline. <br />24. Condition 10 dealing with walkways, clarify if they are to be concrete or <br />stamped asphalt? <br />25. How will the northeast portions of the development site address the <br />adjacent parking structure? <br />26. With CC&R's, professional management of open space, as well as the <br />overall complex should be required. <br />27. What is the ramification if the project is not developed within eight years; <br />does the City revert the zoning. Exhibit F needs to define the time limits <br />affecting the approval. <br />28. Loft design calls for skylights in legend, need to identify location and <br />number. <br />29. Tandem garages, single garages, how are they accessed? Are there <br />separate garages into units? <br />30. Santiago Avenue should remain closed. <br />31. Require better access for pedestrians. <br />32. Require list of materials and amenities that have changed since the <br />August study session with the Commission. <br />33. Landscape required on the eastside of the loop road, indicate on plan. <br />MOTION: 1. Receive and file the public comments for Draft <br />Environmental Impact Report No. 2004-01. <br />2. Continue to Planning Commission meeting on <br />December 13, 2004 <br />MOTION: Mondo SECOND: Cribb <br />VOTE AYES: Cribb, De La Torre, Leo, Lutz, Mondo, Nalle, <br />Sinclair (7) <br />NOES: None (0) <br />ABSTAIN: None (0) <br />ABSENT: None (0) <br />5. Public Comments (for items not on the agenda) <br />No public comments were made. <br />STAFF AND COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />1 <br />6. Staff Comments <br />No comments were made. <br />7. Planning Commission Comments <br />Commissioner Lutz <br />• Requested inspection of junkyard located at West 5th Street and to brief us <br />as to its status. <br />• Requested construction update of project on Flower and 6th Street. Staff <br />will advise. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9 <br />OCTOBER 25, 2004 <br />