Laserfiche WebLink
Which Technologies Are Most Suitable? <br />How Well Does Each Alignment Perform? <br />OTERI'��t�;`rALTERNATIVES <br />EVALUATED <br />lox=STREET <br />VIM, I STREET 440 <br />ATH STREET: y <br />STREET <br />Alternative provides service to City's <br />0% 29.8% <br />33.9% <br />27.0% <br />29.6% <br />adopted transit corridors <br />Number of residents within a 1/4 mile <br />walking distance of proposed alignment (In <br />43 43 <br />45 <br />42 <br />42 <br />thousands) <br />Number of employees within a 1/4 mile <br />walking distance of proposed alignment (in <br />26 27 <br />27 <br />26 <br />25 <br />thousands) <br />Would promotes principles of"Livability" <br />Low <br />Low <br />High <br />High <br />High <br />Would serve transit -supportive land use <br />Low <br />Medium -High <br />High <br />Medium -High <br />Medium <br />WIII be perceived as a significant long-term <br />public Investment in Infrastructure by <br />Medium Medium <br />High <br />High <br />High <br />potential I n v e sto rs/ d e v e l o pe rs <br />Total estimated capital cost <br />Low Low <br />Medium <br />Medium <br />Medium <br />RECOMMENDED RANKING <br />5th 4th <br />1st <br />2nd <br />3rd <br />Top Technology Being Considered <br />❖ Modern Streetcar <br />Runs in street traffic or in exclusive guideway <br />Electrically powered through single overhead wire <br />Typical Vehicle Capacity: 50 seated, up to 100 standing <br />Reduced Set of Alternatives <br />❖ No Build Alternative <br />Depicts what happens if project is not built <br />No further transportation improvements beyond what has <br />already been funded and committed through the year 2035. <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 19 OCTOBER 18, 2010 <br />