Laserfiche WebLink
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS <br />MARCH 2002 AMENDMENT NO. I <br />DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER <br />not result in new impacts beyond the impacts previously analyzed in FEIR 96 -01 and would not <br />substantially increase the severity of any impact to cultural resources identified in FEIR 96 -01. <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not involve any activities that would increase the risk <br />for significant impacts to known and/or unknown cultural resources. Additionally, no new information <br />has been made available since preparation of FEIR 96 -01 that would adversely affect the cultural <br />resource analysis, mitigation measures and environmental determinations made in FEIR 96 -01. <br />Population/Housing/Employment <br />Potential project related and cum lative population, housing, and employment impacts associated with <br />the implementation of the DSC project were adequately evaluated in FEIR 96 -01. FEIR 96 -01 <br />determined that implementation of the DSC project would not result in any significant population, <br />housing, or employment impacts and would result in an actual benefit to the community. The <br />increased development area proposed for DSC Phase II would not result in new population, housing, <br />or employment impacts beyond the impacts previously analyzed in FEIR 96 -01 and would not <br />substantially increase the severity of any population, housing, or employment impact identified in <br />FEIR 96 -01, in that the amount of potential employment opportunities generated by the proposed <br />project would not exceed the employment projections in FEIR 96 -01. Additionally, no new <br />information has been made available since preparation of FEIR 96 -01 that would adversely affect the <br />analysis and environmental determinations made in FEIR 96 -01. <br />Public Services and Utilities <br />Potential project related and cumulative impacts to public services and utilities associated with the <br />implementation of the DSC project were adequately evaluated in FEIR 96 -01. FEIR 96 -01 determined <br />that the DSC project would not result in significant impacts regarding the demand for natural gas, <br />electricity, telephone service, public transit, and schcols. Mitigation measures were included in FOR <br />96 -01 to reduce potential impacts to water service and cable service to a level considered less than <br />significant. FEIR 96 -01, however, determined that implementation of the DSC project would not <br />result in significant impacts. The increased development proposed for DSC Phase II would not result <br />in new impacts to any public services or utilities beyond the impacts previously analyzed in FE1R 96- <br />01 and would not substantially increase the severity of any public service or utility impact identified in <br />FEIR 96 -01, in that the public service and utility demands associated with the proposed project would <br />not exceed the public service and utilitydemand projections established in FEIR 96 -01. Additionally, <br />no new information has been made available since preparation of FEIR 96 -01 that would adversely <br />affect the public service and utility impact analysis, mitigation measures, and environmental <br />determinations made in FEIR 96 -01. <br />Aesthetics /Light and Glare <br />Potential project related and cumulative aesthetic impacts and shade and shadow impacts associated <br />with the implementation of the DSC project were adequately evaluated in FEIR 96 -01. FEIR 96 -01 <br />determined that implementation of the DSC project would not result in any significant aesthetic <br />impacts. Mitigation measures were included in FEIR 96 -01 to reduce potential glare and lighting <br />impacts to a level considered less than sigiifucant. The projected height of the building housing the <br />domed theater is 106 feet, while the existing cube structure is 107 feet. The proposed project would <br />not result in new aesthetic impacts or shade and shadow impacts beyond the impacts previously <br />W ROBUTILESWmend I dsc revl.doc 43/07/02» <br />Page 8 of 17 <br />