My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25B - SANTA ANA BLVD GRADE SEPARATION_ Exhibit A_Color
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
01/18/2011
>
25B - SANTA ANA BLVD GRADE SEPARATION_ Exhibit A_Color
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 2:35:02 PM
Creation date
1/3/2011 12:58:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25G
Date
1/4/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
growth in population and employment in the surrounding areas, the City <br />proposes the grade separation to alleviate the current and potential traffic <br />impacts and hazards posed by the existing at -grade rail crossing at Santa Ana <br />Boulevard and OCTA Metrolink RR. Based on the land use and the proximity of <br />the Interstate 5 (1 -5) ramps to the east and Santiago Street to the west, the <br />proposed PROJECT will likely depress Santa Ana Boulevard under the railroad <br />tracks to provide uninterrupted flow of roadway and rail traffic, which will improve <br />freight movement, corridor crossing safety, and air quality. <br />CONTENT OF PROPOSAL <br />In order to maintain uniformity with all proposals furnished by the Consultants, all <br />proposals are limited to a maximum of 30 pages (excluding front and back <br />covers, section dividers and resumes) and shall include the following: <br />A. Cover letter highlighting the Prime Consultant's qualifications and the primary <br />location where the PROJECT work will be performed. There shall be <br />indication that the proposal will be valid for 90 days and must be signed by an <br />officer that has authority to bind the Consultant. <br />B. Project understanding and approach discussing the PROJECT, key issues, <br />and any suggestions or special concerns that the City should be made aware <br />of. This section should demonstrate experience and expertise in all areas <br />required to perform work described in the Scope of Work. <br />C. A detailed scope of work identifying each required task for the preparation of <br />PSRE in accordance with the City, OCTA, Southern California Regional Rail <br />Authority (SCRRA), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal <br />Railroad Administration (FRA), BNSF, California Department of <br />Transportation (Caltrans) and other involved agencies' policies and <br />requirements, along with any additional tasks not currently identified in this <br />RFP, but are necessary for the successful completion of the PROJECT. <br />D. Project schedule, project management plan (PMP) and quality <br />assurance /quality control (QA/QC) plan to be implemented on the PROJECT <br />that will ensure the required services to complete in a timely manner and a <br />quality acceptable to the City. The QA/QC shall ensure that reports, plans, <br />estimates, and other documents are complete, accurate, proofread, and <br />checked to meet professional engineering and environmental practices prior <br />to submitting for review. The Consultants shall provide the firm's workload <br />and the ability to perform the work requested, specifically as it relates to the <br />Project Manager and key personnel. <br />E. Project team organizational chart identifying the Project Manager and those <br />who will be performing the work along with a brief resume of each team <br />member, including similar type of projects in which he /she has been directly <br />T <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.