My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25G - ENGINEERING SRVS GRADE SEPARATION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
01/04/2011
>
25G - ENGINEERING SRVS GRADE SEPARATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:55:46 PM
Creation date
1/4/2011 7:05:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25G
Date
1/4/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> growth in population and employment in the surrounding areas, the City <br /> proposes the grade separation to alleviate the current and potential trafi~ic <br /> impacts and hazards posed by the existing at-grade rail crossing at Santa Ana <br /> Boulevard and OCTA ~etrolink RR. Based on the land use and the proximity of <br /> the Interstate 5 (I-5} ramps to the east and Santiago Street to the west, the <br /> proposed PROJECT will likely depress Santa Ana Boulevard under the railroad <br /> tracks to provide uninterrupted flow of roadway and rail traffic, which will improve <br /> freight movement, corridor crossing safety, and air quality. <br /> <br /> III. CONTENT OF PROPOSAL <br /> <br /> In order to maintain uniformity with all proposals furnished by the Consultants, all <br /> proposals are limited to a maximum of 30 pages (excluding front and back <br /> covers, section dividers and resumes} and shall include the following: <br /> <br /> A. Cover letter highlighting the Prime Consultant's qualifications and the primary <br /> location where the PROJECT work will be performed. There shall be <br /> indication that the proposal will be valid for 90 days and must be signed by an <br /> ofi~icer that has authority to bind the Consultant. <br /> <br /> B. Project understanding and approach discussing the PROJECT, key issues, <br /> and any suggestions or special concerns that the City should be made aware <br /> of. This section should demonstrate experience and expertise in all areas <br /> required to perform work described in the Scope of Work. <br /> <br /> C. A detailed scope of work identifying each required task for the preparation of <br /> PSRE in accordance with the City, OCTA, Southern California Regional Rail <br /> Authority (SCRRA}, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA}, Federal <br /> Railroad Administration (FRA}, BNSF, California Department of <br /> Transportation (Caltrans} and other involved agencies' policies and <br /> requirements, along with any additional tasks not currently identified in this <br /> RFP, but are necessary for the successful completion of the PROJECT. <br /> <br /> D. Project schedule, project management plan (PMP} and quality <br /> assurance/quality control (QAIQC} plan to be implemented on the PROJECT <br /> that will ensure the required services to complete in a timely manner and a <br /> quality acceptable to the City. The QA/QC shall ensure that reports, plans, <br /> estimates, and other documents are complete, accurate, proofread, and <br /> checked to meet professional engineering and environmental practices prior <br /> to submitting for review. The Consultants shall provide the firm's workload <br /> and the ability to perform the work requested, specifically as it relates to the <br /> Project Manager and key personnel. <br /> <br /> E. Project team organizational chart identifying the Project Manager and those <br /> who will be performing the work along with a brief resume of each team <br /> member, including similar type of projects in which he/she has been directly <br /> <br /> <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.