25G - ENGINEERING SRVS GRADE SEPARATION

Home Browse Search

II ~ . II 111111 iiiiii III. Environmental -Engaging the environmental planners II during the initial alignment studies will be critical to ensuring AECOM has developed the schedule shown in III ° I I that the all components are adequately covered in the PES based upon past experience on similar projects. We have or PEAR, which will facilitate approvals through the City for demonstrated our ability to deliver planning documents on CEQA and Caltrans for NEPA. grade separations, from Feasibility Studies and PSRE's to Response Procedures - AECOM takes a very proactive full Project Report/Environmental Documents. Within the stance in addressing issues and comments as they arise. last 12 months, AECOM has worked on the following grade This eliminates need for rehashing of previous issues separation planning documents: or multi-cycle reviews and responses at each submittal Raymond Avenue milestone. There are several components in achievingthis: Orangethorpe Avenue 1. Develop and action list, each uniquely numbered, to Baldwin Park Avenue track them from inception to closure. Puente Avenue Jurupa Avenue 2. Conduct workshop meetings with stakeholders prior to McKinley Street submittals to review the product and receive feedback. Streeter Avenue 3. Develop a comment response matrix to track comments through to closeout. Our experience also helps us understand the critical AECOM is confident that in our approach to this project, along elements which need to be address to ensure the project with our relationships with the City, SCRRA, OCTA, Caltrans, schedule is met, and these include: and the utility companies, we will meet the schedule as Third Party Coordination -Actively engaging third parties, shown. from the railroads to the utility companies, from day one of the project is essential. Maintaining the open line of communication and flow of information is crucial to timely responses, direction and approval. Early agreement on design parameters, such as vertical clearances for the railroad, as well as relocation alternatives for utilities, will help pave the path for approvals. ID Task Name Duration M-1 M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 1 NTP 0 days 2 Phase I- PSR and PES or PEAR 175 days 3 Project Management/Coordination 170 days 4 Project Study Report 175 days _ 5 Research & Data Collection 5 days ~ 6 Obtain ROE from SCRRA 30 days 7 PreparelObtain Approval Traffic Control Plan 15 days 8 lJtility Identification 50 days ~ 9 Topo/BaselField WorklDesign Surveys 20 days ~ 10 Pre are Alternatives Conce is 3 Min. 50 da s p p ~ ) y 11 Prepare Traffic Analysis and TMP for Alts. 30 days 12 Geotechnical Recommendations 30 days 13 Structural APS's 30 days ~ 14 Hydraulics and Hydrology Study 30 days ~ 15 Right-of-Way _Identification 10 days ~ ~ 16 Cost Estimates 20 days e ' ~ ' 17 Structural Type Selection 20 days ~ 18 Conceptual Engineering Plans for Alts. 20 days ~ ~ _ 19 Draft Project Study Report Equivalent 30 days ~ 20 Submit Draft PSRE to City 0 days 21 City Review Draft PSRE 15 days P 22 Final PSRE 10 days ~ 23 City Review/Approve Final PSRE 15 days ~ 24 Environmental PES or PEAR 40 days 25 Environmental PES _or PEAR 40 days ~i ~ II~~ ire I~~~s~~d S~~ I~~ ~~d u„~ I,~~ ar ,I~ ~ , II II ~r ~ II x „N~~~ I~~~~~~W ~ I III II I I I ~vir~ ~ ~ l ~,~~„ficn u.... „ ir~ ~ ~ .