Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-9-0825 <br />EXHIBIT A <br />CONSULTANT shall take into consideration the pedestrian timing <br />parameters used by the local agency on a case by case basis. <br />4. Timing parameters which incorporate minimal pedestrian activity to <br />provide the optimum vehicle split and offset timing and accommodate <br />pedestrians using various pedestrian timing adjustment techniques for <br />pedestrian splits during coordination. <br />5. Appropriate cycle lengths and signal groupings consistent with the goals <br />of this effort. Preliminary proposed cycle lengths and signal groupings <br />were developed by the previous consultant and presented to the agencies <br />for review and comment. All agency preliminary comments have been <br />addressed by the previous consultant. Additionally, the previous <br />consultant has recommended time-of-day start and stop intervals for the <br />various timing plans. <br />6. CONSULTANT shall update, at minimum, timing plans which consider the <br />following peak periods: a.m. peak, mid-day peak, p.m. peak and one <br />weekend peak. Timing plans shall be in both Synchro format and the <br />preferred timing chart format of each agency. <br />7. CONSULTANT shall update timing plans for a.m. peak, mid-day peak, <br />p.m. peak and a weekend peak based on the upcoming improvements for <br />the corridor as identified. Timing plans shall be in Synchro format and the <br />preferred timing chart format of each agency. <br />8. CONSULTANT shall review, verify, and update the previously prepared <br />Time-Space Diagrams for the synchronized segments along the BRT <br />Corridor. <br />Previous consultant prepared a Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan detailing <br />the signal timing optimization, including detail evaluation and recommendation on <br />the time-referencing system and analysis results. The Draft Signal Timing <br />Optimization Plan included, but was not limited to, the following: <br />a. Proposed cycle lengths and signal groupings by corridor and by agency. <br />b. All Draft optimized and synchronized traffic signal timing plans in Synchro <br />format, including (a) existing corridor conditions and (b) planned and <br />programmed improvements (widening projects and intersection <br />improvements) within the next five years (after NTP). <br />c. Draft Time-Space diagrams for the synchronized segments along the BRT <br />Corridor. <br />The Draft Signal Timing Optimization Plan was submitted to AUTHORITY and <br />agencies for review and comment. AUTHORITY has already provided their <br />review and all comments were addressed by the previous consultant. <br />Scope of Work 50 05/18/'1 O