My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/25/1995
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
09/25/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:58:42 PM
Creation date
1/27/2011 10:58:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
9/25/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Joseph Getz, indicated he owns the shopping center east of the proposed car <br />...~aA s..A o....-veesA n..n nevna vnn~vA:nn Chu nrn~en~ nveal:nn ~AAi4inn~l tvaFF:n <br />Mr. Joseph Getz, indicated he owns the shopping center east of the proposed car <br />wash and expressed concerns regarding the project creating additional traffic <br />congestion and problems. <br />Commissioner Segura asked if the machinery could be operated after the car wash <br />closed and if aomeone would be able to control loitering. <br />Mr. Koahkerian indicated that the machinery would be controlled in the office, <br />therefore, after the car wash closed it would be impossible for the machinery to <br />bs operated. During operating hours there would be someone to control loitering, <br />however after the car wash closed no staff would be available. <br />Commissioner Pedroza asked if adequate lighting would be provided for the rear <br />area of the car wash. <br />Mr. Mike McCoy, Police Department, responded the code requires that a minimum of <br />one foot candle be maintained for the entire site. <br />Commissioner Oliver moved to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance <br />approving Amendment Application No. 95-5 and approve Conditional Use Permit No. <br />95-20 as conditioned by staff and adopt the findings as submitted by staff. The <br />motion was seconded by Commissioner Na11e. <br />AYES: Mondo, Brown, Oliver, Doughty, Nalle, Pedroza, and Segura <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />5. DEVELOPI~NT AGREEMENT NO 85-1 filed by Catellus Development Corporation, Ingram <br />Hicro Inc., and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company to extend Development Agreement <br />No. 85-1 for PacifiCenter located generally north of St Gertrude Place and south <br />of Edinger Avenue between Grand Avenue and Ritchey Street. (Bill Apple) <br />LEGAL NOTICE: September 15, 1995 <br />PUBLIC NOTICES: September 15, 1995 <br />Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving the extension of <br />Development Agreement No. 85-1. <br />Mr. Bill Apple, Assistant Planner II, briefly indicated that the applicant <br />requests to extend the Development Agreement for five years for the PacifiCenter. <br />The extended Agreement would expire October 17, 2000. This Agreement would <br />' regulate any development within the boundaries of this project site and would be <br />governed by the conditions and standards specified within the Development <br />Agreement. <br />Mr. Paul LaPlante, Ingram Micro, requested the Commission to support the <br />extension of the Agreement and stated that the Agreement would help employ 1,600 <br />people. <br />Commissioner Nalle moved to approve Development Agreement No. 85-01. The motion <br />was seconded by Commissioner Oliver. <br />AYES: Hondo, Brown, Doughty, Oliver, Nalle, Pedroza, and Segura <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />6. VARIANCB NO. 95-5 filed by Mr. Ralph Espinoza to allow a reduction in lot size <br />and circulation requirements for the construction of a 1,423 square foot office <br />building in the General Commercial (C1) zoning district. (Marta Crane) <br />LEGAL NOTICE: September 15, 1995 <br />PUBLIC NOTICES: September 15, 1995 <br />RECOIYdr1iDATION: <br />Approve Variance No. 95-5 as conditioned by staff and adopt the findings ae <br />submitted by staff. <br />Me. Marta Crane, Assistant Planner II, presented an overview of the applicant's <br />request to allow relief from lot size and circulation to construct an office <br />building on the southwest corner of Edinger. Staff recommended approval of the <br />' project as conditioned. <br />Commissioner Oliver asked if the applicant owned the adjacent lot and if eo, why <br />staff would recommend the development of the smaller size parcel. <br />Ma. Crane indicated that staff reviewed the project as a freestanding entity. <br />Mr. Adams noted that the code requires a 15,000 square foot parcel for commercial <br />development. Staff had a responsibility to review the request by the applicant, <br />however the Commission needs to evaluate the request against its previous <br />policies. <br />Commissioner Oliver expressed concerns regarding allowing the development of a <br />smaller parcel when the applicant has the opportunity to meet the required lot <br />size. <br />PLANNING CGMM1%lOH MINLTfFS Sepmeber 25, 1995 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.