Laserfiche WebLink
RECOMMENDATION: <br />Adopt a resolution approving a Certificate of Appropriateness for Historic Exterior <br />Modification Application No. 2005-03. <br />Hafly Soboleske presented the staff report and recommendation. <br />Commission discussion ensued regarding the visibility of the structure; rear <br />elevation siding to match existing siding, roof material and lack of detail to the <br />proposed modifications. <br />Jackie Hare, consultant for the applicant, stated that the exterior elements of the <br />structure (materials and color) will match the house. Ms. Hare offered to make <br />detailed information available with the pending permit application. <br />Ms. Soboleske suggested creating conditions of approval on the project by <br />including details of the clapboard siding, roofing material and window material. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />No comments were made. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Ms. Hare indicated that the rear elevation included the addition of three new <br />doors. <br />Ed Fletcher, attorney for applicant, sought approval of the project tonight due to <br />pending litigation on this property scheduled for a September 16 hearing. <br />MOTION: Continue the item to September 1, 2005. <br />MOTION: Lutz SECONDED: O'Callaghan <br />Commission discussion ensued regarding the roof line and the lower pitched roof that <br />appeared not to match the existing roof as shown on Exhibit 2. <br />Commissioner Sarmiento inquired about the ramifications if the public hearing was <br />continued. Ms. Otto indicated Commission continuance may delay the court settlement. <br />Commissioner Sarmiento noted that the litigation hearing is scheduled for September <br />16, the next Historic Commission hearing is September 1, which would allow sufficient <br />time to prepare documentation for litigation. <br />Chair Giles commented that with the information presented, there was not enough detail <br />available for the Commission to reach a decision. Chair Giles noted that the project <br />architect should be available. <br />MOTION: Lutz SECOND: O'Callaghan <br />VOTE: AYES: Chinn, Corpin, Giles, Lutz, O'Callaghan, Sarmiento, <br /> Seeley (7) <br />NOES: None (0) <br />ABSENT: Bustamante, Schaefer (2) <br />' <br />ABSTAIN: None (0) <br />Chair Giles stated that Historic Resources Application No. 2005-06 and Historic <br />Register Categorization No. 2005-06 for property at 2030 North Flower will be continued <br />to September 1, 2005. <br />3. Public Comments (items not on the agenda) <br />No comments were made. <br />Historic Resources Commission Agenda 4 August 4, 2005 <br />