12/08/1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Motion to recommend that the City Council: 1) receive an file the Categorical Exemption for Environmental Review No. 99-166; and 2) that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Historical Ordinance Amendment No. 99-04. MOTION: Corpin AYES: Kings, Berry, Chamberlain, Corpin, Cribb, NOES: None ABSENT: Brenes and Simons ABSTAIN: None 2. HISTORICAL RESOURCES COMMISSION APPLICA Filed by the City of Santa Ana to place the Central Auto Register of Historical Properties located at 115 North Syc LEGALLY NOTICED: November 29, 1999 PUBLICLY NOTICED: November 30, 1999 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Receive and file the Categorical Exemption for 2. Adopt a resolution approving Historical Resources Mr. Sergio Klotz, Community Development, presented the Cribb and Giles Works stmcture on the Santa Ana e Street. Review No. 99-1b3. Application No. 99-04. report and recommendation. Ms. Dianne Saevedro, representing the Charles Company, t~te property owner was opposed to placing the property on the Register and she expressed conc rns regarding receival of adequate notice from staff of the hearing. In addition, she expresse concern that the placement of the property on the Register would not allow the development of the property as planned. ' Mr. Marvin Jarman, Realtor, stated that he was opposed to taff's recommendation and that he believed the property owner was trying to acquire pazcels t develop additional tenants at the site. In addition, he stated that he and the property owner ould be willing to work with staff on development designs. Mr. Paul Cullen, attorney representing the property owne ,expressed concern regazding the lack of adequate noticing to the property owner and of allowing the property owner appropriate time to research the matter. In addition, he requested a postponement in the Commission action on the Historical Resources Commission pplication No. 99-04. Commissioner Giles questioned staff on the intent of placing the property on the Register. Mr. Charles View, Downtown Development Manager, stated at staff was trying to protect the historical structure and staffs recommendation was not ag inst the tenant; the Commission's action would not impact the use, however, if the owner o the property wanted to alter the stmcture, the future modifications would require Comtnissio review and approval. Ms. Dianne Saevedro emphasized her concerns regarding gown Act violations due to only receiving notice of the project and action within 72 hours, th~t she would like the opportunity to work with the City regarding the development of the site, anal the Commission's action to place the property on the Register would greatly effect the econom#c viability of the site. Madam Chair Kings questioned staff regazding the notice tven to the property owner of the hearing. Staff stated that they believed the noticing was le~al and they were comfortable with ' the noticing provided to the property owner. I Motion to: 1) receive and fde the Categorical Exemption r Environmental Review No. 99- 163 and 2) adopt a resolution approving Historical Resou ces Commission Application No. 99-04. MOTION: Chamberlain Second: Cribb AYES: Kings, Berry, Chamberlain, Corpin, Cribb, ~'iartner, and Giles NOES: None ABSENT: Brenes and Simons ABSTAIN: None