My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - VARIANCE - REDUCTION OF LANDSCAPE 1901 N TUSTIN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
03/21/2011
>
31A - VARIANCE - REDUCTION OF LANDSCAPE 1901 N TUSTIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:49:43 PM
Creation date
3/16/2011 5:57:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
3/21/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Variance No. 2011-01 <br />February 28, 2011 <br />Page 2 <br />reroofing of the entire structure, the addition of green screen trellises, a trellis system over the building <br />entrance and the repainting of the entire building. Site improvements will consist of the closure of the <br />westernmost driveway on Lenita Lane, the removal of existing landscaping and the planting of new <br />landscaping, the repairing and repaving of the parking lot and new site lighting. Improvements to the <br />interior of the building will also be made and will include new non-bearing walls to create new exam <br />and office space for the medical facility, new restrooms, upgrades to make the building ADA <br />accessible, new flooring and paint. Once completed, the project will convey a sense of quality that is <br />appropriate for an office use and satisfies the design standards set forth in the Urban Design Element <br />and the Citywide Design Guidelines (Exhibits 3, 4, 5 and 6). <br />Access to the project will be provided from both Tustin Avenue and Lenita Lane. The parking <br />requirement for medical office buildings is six spaces per 1,000 square feet of building (Sec. 41- <br />1346). A total of 40 parking spaces will be provided on-site which is in compliance with the code. <br />Project Background <br />The building was constructed in 1962 and was occupied by the Automobile Club of Southern <br />California (AAA) until 1999. At the time of its construction the building complied with all development <br />standards then in place. Subsequent to its construction Tustin Avenue was realigned, the property <br />was split by the new road, and the original Tustin Avenue became Old Tustin Avenue. This property <br />split reduced the building's front yard setback making it non-compliant with today's development <br />standards. The building is in compliance with all other development standards. <br />In 2004, the Bagel Me Corporation submitted plans, and received approval, for a variance and minor <br />exception. The variance was to allow a reduction in setbacks for the building, while the minor <br />exception granted a reduction in parking for a restaurant use. Bagel Me had intended to open a <br />5,100 square foot Bagel Me restaurant while subleasing the remaining 1,400 square feet to an office <br />use. However, in late 2005, Bagel Me decided not to move forward with their project and withdrew <br />their applications. The building has remained vacant since 1999. <br />General Plan and Zonina Analysis <br />The General Plan land use designation for the site is General Commercial (GC), which allows for <br />commercial and office uses. General Commercial Districts are primarily located on commercial <br />corridors and major arterial roadways in the City. They provide accessible commercial <br />development along the City's arterials as well as provide support facilities and services, including <br />office, restaurants and various other services. The project is consistent with this General Plan land <br />use designation. <br />The subject site is located in the Community Commercial (Cl) zoning district. The C1 zone is a <br />general commercial zone that allows for office uses such as the proposed medical facility. The <br />proposed use is also consistent with the zoning. However, due to noncompliance with the setback <br />standards, the project is legal nonconforming with current development standards. <br />31A-4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.