POWEL CONSTRUCTORS, INC. - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Project 06 -1723 RFA Change Order No. 6 June 22, 2012 Page 2 3. After installing Stage 2 traffic control for the construction of the southern half of the bridge it was determined by Traffic Engineering that the traffic control needed some adjustments to provide safer movements for the side street traffic. The costs are to compensate the contractor to sandblast, restripe, and install additional delineators per the revised traffic control plan. (PCO 23). AGREED COST = $19,601 4. While forming the MSE wall cap located at the northeast corner of the bridge it was determined that the designed planters within the wall cap would not fit. The concentrated amount of reinforcement within in the cap could not be moved or cut_ The costs are to compensate the contractor to form and pour a new planter on top of the wall cap. (PCO 24). AGREED COST = $49,476 5. While laying out the new sidewalk, curb and gutter and asphalt where the street joins the existing mobile home park, located at the northeast corner of the bridge, it was discovered that there was a bust in the elevation. In order to effectively join the new street with the private property the existing curb needed to be realigned. The costs are to compensate the contractor to remove and replace a section of asphalt and curb and gutter at the join between the street and private property_ (PCO 25). AGREED COST = $1 ,942 6. During a preconstruction meeting with the City's Water Department it was determined before the contractor ties the new water line into the existing a thrust block would be needed around the existing valve, if one did not exist. The costs are to compensate the contractor to pothole and verify that there is an existing thrust block_ (PCO 26). AGREED COST = $1,156 7. After making the modifications to Phase 2 traffic control plans in PCO 23, the mobile home park located at the northeast corner of the bridge advised the City that traffic control modification restricted its residents from entering and exiting the mobile home park. This restriction was causing some motorists to make unsafe movements. It was determined that the contractor's work area could be adjusted to accommodate the installation of a turning pocket at the mobile home park. The costs are to compensate the contractor to revise its construction area by relocating the K -rail, removing some curb, patching the area with asphalt and restriping the street. (PCO 27). AGREED COST = $24,157 8. In order to accommodate the new planter, per PCO24, the irrigation needed to be relocated out of the MSE wall cap_ The costs are to compensate the contractor to relocate the irrigation line to the new planter. (PCO 29). AGREED COST = $1,357