Laserfiche WebLink
Project 06 -1723 <br />RFA Change Order No. 7 <br />January 25, 2013 <br />Page 3 <br />8. In order to accommodate the new planter, per PCO 24, the irrigation needed to be <br />relocated out of the MSE wall cap. The additional costs are to compensate the <br />contractor for all labor and equipment to relocate the irrigation line to the new planter. <br />(PCO 29) / <br />AGREED COST = $1,357 / <br />9. During the course of the bridge construction, excessive graffiti was continually <br />encountered on adjacent property walls and buildings. In order to mitigate the graffiti it <br />was recommended to remove the graffiti regularly. Graffiti removal is outside the scope <br />of the contract therefore, the additional costs compensate the contractor for all labor <br />and equipment to remove the graffiti. (PCO 36) <br />AGREED COST = $2,750 <br />10. After the new sound wall was installed at the northeast corner of the bridge, the <br />adjacent property owner informed the City that the sound wall restricted motorist's <br />vision of oncoming pedestrians and bicyclists when exiting the property. The City's <br />Traffic Engineering Section reviewed the situation and recommended 15 -feet of the <br />wall be removed to improve sight distance. The additional costs compensate the <br />contractor for all labor and equipment to saw cut, remove, and dispose of the 15 foot <br />section of wall. (PCO 37) % <br />AGREED COST = $2,406 <br />11. After completion of the bridge, at the southwest corner, the property owner informed <br />the City that the new barrier rail was to close to their home's roof which sacrificed the <br />security of their property. After a careful review, it was recommended to increase the <br />barrier rail height to seven feet by adding a 48" high CMU wall to the top of the barrier <br />rail. The additional costs compensate the contractor for all labor and equipment to <br />install a 148 foot long CMU wall on top of the barrier rail adjacent to the property. (PCO <br />38) <br />AGREED COST = $25,887 V <br />12. In advance of building the MSE wall located at the southwest corner of the bridge it was <br />determined that the excavation for the new footing would undermine the adjacent <br />property wall. After reviewing the issue with the property owner it was determined that it <br />would be more cost effective to remove the existing wall and extend the adjacent <br />property fences two feet to abut the new MSE wall. The additional costs compensate <br />the contractor for all labor and equipment to extend two block walls, two chain link <br />fences, one wood fence, one wrought iron fence and the parking lot pavement two feet. <br />(PCO 38) <br />AGREED COST= $12,401 <br />13. The contract documents show construction of new sidewalk at southwest corner of the <br />bridge with variable in widths from 8 to 15 feet. After careful review, the City's Design <br />Engineering Section revised the plans to move the curb and gutter back to create a <br />constant eight foot wide sidewalk. This revision requires the construction of variable <br />