My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH - AMEND DEVELOPMENT AGMT 2005-02
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
04/04/2011
>
75B - PH - AMEND DEVELOPMENT AGMT 2005-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:48:50 PM
Creation date
3/31/2011 1:32:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75B
Date
4/4/2011
Destruction Year
2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9. Determination of Significant Impact <br />i <br />To analyze future conditions it is necessary to analyze the traffic impacts related to development of the <br />project. The traffic impacts for the proposed project are determined by comparing the traffic <br />conditions in the future without the project to comparable future conditions with the proposed project <br />with special consideration at locations where level of service is not forecast to be adequate. <br />It is also necessary to indicate whether any predicted traffic impacts are significant. Traffic impacts are <br />identified as significant if the proposed project results in a significant change in traffic conditions on a <br />roadway or intersection. The significant impact criteria provided below are based on all cities traffic <br />study guidelines (City of Santa Ana, City of Costa Mesa, and City of Irvine). The thresholds to <br />determine significant traffic impacts for purposes of this project are as follows: <br />• A significant project impact occurs when the ICU value increases by greater than .01 and achieves <br />unacceptable level of service ("E" or "F") or worse. <br />Since no unsignalized intersection is included in the study area, discussion for the impact of the <br />unsignalized intersections is not included. <br />Table 9 shows the comparison of study intersections under Opening Year (2013) conditions. As <br />indicated, the proposed project will not generate significant impact to the intersections within the study <br />area. <br />Table 10 shows the comparison of study intersections under Long Range (2035) conditions. As <br />indicated, the proposed project will not generate significant impact to all intersections within the study <br />area. <br />E, KOA CORPORATION Updated Main and MacArthur Development Project <br />PLANNING & ENGINEERING 34 Traffic Impact Study in City of Santa Ana <br />75B-166
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.