My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AECOM 1 - 2011
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
>
AECOM 1 - 2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2017 11:58:03 AM
Creation date
4/6/2011 11:51:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
AECOM
Contract #
A-2011-024
Agency
PUBLIC WORKS
Council Approval Date
1/18/2011
Expiration Date
1/1/2013
Insurance Exp Date
4/1/2014
Destruction Year
2021
Notes
Amended by A-2011-024-01, -02, -03
Document Relationships
AECOM (FORMERLY DMJM HARRIS) 1A - 2011
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
AECOM (FORMERLY DMJM HARRIS) 1B - 2011
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
AECOM (FORMERLY DMJM HARRIS) 1C - 2014
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rail profile. In order to facilitate the traffic staging/handling during the construction, the walls constructed parallel <br />to Santa Ana Boulevard could be constructed using "top-down" construction; that is to build the wall first, and <br />then excavate the roadway in front of the wall to final grade. We will perform Value Analysis to determine the <br />most cost effective retaining wall type, top down approach vs. conventional cantilever retaining wall using <br />temporary shoring. <br />A Single Span Structure Alternative can also be considered. The span length required to span the Santa Ana <br />Boulevard roadbed is approximately 134'. The typical span range for this type of construction extends to about <br />150 -ft under Cooper E-80 loading. Therefore, even though the required span is nearing the upper limit of the <br />typical structure span length, this structure type is suitable for construction of new underpass. The total structure <br />depth for the replacement of the double track would be approximately 13'-6". Provisions can be made in the <br />bridge design so that is capable of supporting a future third track, should this become a requirement of <br />OCTA/SCRRA. To support a possible third track, the through girder, on the either left or right side of the <br />underpass, will be required to have a structure depth approaching 15' in order to support the full weight of a <br />Cooper E-80 live load. <br />During the APS development, through a careful and deliberate process, we will study a number of different <br />structure alternatives and configurations against various interchange alternatives, and develop associated costs. <br />Deliverables: Draft and Final Structure Type Selection Report <br />Task 1.7 Existing and Future Utilities Issues/Permitting <br />Utility Impacts/Coordination <br />We will identity and coordinate with the various utility companies for the location and descriptions of their facilities, <br />including any potential for future utility improvements. <br />Utility Meetings and Utility Coordination <br />Coordinate and schedule meetings with Utility Owners and project stake holders as may be required. <br />Existing Utility Research <br />We will provide utility research services to include: <br />• Notify Underground Service Alert and request a listing of member utility companies within the project <br />area. <br />• Make a field reconnaissance of the utilities within the project area. <br />• Send a written notice to the identified utility companies in the proposed project area notifying them of the <br />proposed project, and request copies of their existing utility maps and information regarding their plans for <br />future improvements. <br />• Prepare a preliminary Utility Conflict Maps from record information and field observations showing those <br />utilities to be protected in place and those to be relocated to clear construction. <br />• Overhead lines will be located and vertical clearance will be determined over the proposed improvements <br />to assure that minimum vertical clearance is maintained. <br />• Determination of prior rights as they relate to responsibility for the cost of relocations. <br />City of Santa Ana <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.