Laserfiche WebLink
■ AECOM <br />Task 1.6 Structural Analyses/APS <br />Development of the PSRE and PRE will require the <br />preparation of a bridge Advance Planning Study (APS) <br />for Santa Ana Boulevard Underpass. The purpose of the <br />APS is to evaluate feasible structure types, understand <br />City requirements, identify constraints, and develop <br />associated cost estimate summary for the structure <br />work involved. The APS General Plan (GP) clearly <br />delineates all the structural elements identified in the <br />PSRE and the PRE typically using the minimum detailing <br />necessary and basic dimensions, which will help <br />develop a reasonable cost estimate. As a minimum, the <br />APS GP will show Plan, Elevation, and Typical Section <br />views and wilt make note of all critical assumptions. <br />Additional APS's will be prepared as appropriate to <br />consider alternative structure types. The APS General <br />Plan and APS Report will be prepared on the most <br />current Caltrans APS formatted plan sheet, and <br />templates respectively. <br />Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Reports (SPGR) are <br />required as part of APS to identify basic site <br />parameters, which may have a significant impact on the <br />structure scope and cost. In addition, a comprehensive <br />design memo must be prepared to summarize and <br />document the following key items: <br />• Important or unusual design assumptions or <br />structure features. <br />• Discussions with City/OCTA/SCRRA personnel <br />concerning any key assumptions. <br />• Modifications from Structure Maintenance <br />Records recommendations. <br />• Seismic retrofit modifications. <br />• City requirements such as aesthetics, <br />improvements in vicinity of the structure, <br />airspace usage, or other obstructions. <br />• Special foundation requirements, special <br />excavations such as Type A, Type D, and/or <br />hazardous or contaminated material. <br />• Special construction requirements, including <br />limited site accessibility. <br />• Stage Construction. <br />The information identified in the APS, as listed above, <br />and preliminary structure costs are used as a part of the <br />evaluation to select the best project alternative. <br />Santa Ana Bo�utevard Underpass <br />It is proposed to construct a railroad bridge by lowering <br />the Santa Ana Boulevard. <br />A 2 -Span Structure Alternative would work very well at <br />this location. This proposed double track railroad <br />bridge structure is approximately 126.7 feet long and <br />40.3 feet wide, with no skew to Santa Ana Boulevard. A <br />Pier Bent is needed in the median of Santa Ana <br />Boulevard, which will result in the maximum span <br />length of 63.3 feet, and therefore a SCRRA Standard <br />Precast/Prestressed (PC/PS) Double Cell Box Girder <br />Structure can be used for the structure type. <br />Precast units can expedite the construction schedule, <br />helping to reduce impacts to both the rail and the road <br />traffic. In addition, a precast, simply supported <br />structure is the preferred railroad bridge type because <br />of its flexibility for repair and replacement in the future. <br />Significant shoring would be required around the <br />construction area when constructing the bridge. <br />Retaining walls would be required for both the roadway <br />depression and the raise of the rail profile. In order to <br />facilitate the traffic staging/handling during the <br />construction, the walls constructed parallel to Santa <br />Ana Boulevard could be constructed using "top-down" <br />construction; that is to build the wall first, and then <br />excavate the roadway in front of the wall to final grade. <br />We will perform Value Analysis to determine the most <br />cost effective retaining wall type, top down approach vs. <br />conventional cantilever retaining wall using temporary <br />shoring. <br />A Single Span Structure Alternative can also be <br />considered. The span length required to span the Santa <br />Ana Boulevard roadbed is approximately 134'. The <br />typical span range for this type of construction extends <br />to about 150 -ft under Cooper E-80 loading. Therefore, <br />even though the required span is nearing the upper limit <br />of the typical structure span length, this structure type <br />is suitable for construction of new underpass. The total <br />structure depth for the replacement of the double track <br />would be approximately 13'-6". Provisions can be made <br />in the bridge design so that is capable of supporting a <br />future third track, should this become a requirement of <br />OCTA/SCRRA. To support a possible third track, the <br />through girder, on the either left or right side of the <br />underpass, will be required to have a structure depth <br />approaching 15' in orderto support the full weight of a <br />Cooper E-80 live load. <br />During the APS development, through a careful and <br />deliberate process, we will study a number of different <br />structure alternatives and configurations against <br />various interchange alternatives, and develop <br />associated costs. <br />Deliverables.- <br />0 <br />eliverables:• Draftand Final Structure Type Selection Report <br />Task 1.7 Existing and Future Utilities <br />Issues/Permitting <br />We will identity and coordinate with the various utility <br />companies for the location and descriptions of their <br />facilities, including any potential for future utility <br />improvements. <br />Utility Meetings and Utility Coordination <br />Coordinate and schedule meetings with Utility Owners <br />and project stake holders as may be required. <br />Proposal for Project Study Report Equivalent and Conceptual Engineering Plans for <br />Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project <br />