My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2011-04-18
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
04/18/2011
>
FULL PACKET_2011-04-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 1:18:05 PM
Creation date
4/18/2011 3:37:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
4/18/2011
Destruction Year
2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
780
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alignment to SCIP Goals, Objectives, and /or Initiatives: (not to exceed 1 page) <br />Identify how the project aligns to the SCIP: 1) needs and /or gaps identified; 2) goals and objectives; and 3) <br />specific initiative(s). Describe where the need /gap, goal, objective, and /or initiative was identified (provide <br />specific header and page number references). <br />Priority and Need <br />E. g., Hire Interoperability Coordinator <br />Related Goal(s) <br />Goal X, (SCIP Section x: Page x): Insert description of the goal(s) <br />Related Objective(s) <br />Objective X, (SCIP Section x: Page x): Insert description of the <br />objective(s) <br />Related Strategic Initiative(s) <br />Strategic Initiative X, (SCIP Section x: Page x): Insert description <br />of the initiative(s) <br />Governance: (not to exceed a % page) <br />Identify the governance structures in place that will support the development and implementation of the <br />project. Explain how this objective will be communicated to the statewide interoperable emergency <br />communications governance committee. <br />Performance Measure(s) and Basis of Evaluation: (not to exceed a % page) <br />Indicate the performance measure(s) that will be used to evaluate this project's impact and the basis for <br />developing the measure(s). The performance measures should focus on quantifiable outcomes. For <br />example, an outcome could be: <br />• Improved coordination between adjacent local jurisdictions or improved coordination between <br />Federal, State, or local entities in the same location. <br />• Exercise results demonstrating increased operability, increased inter - operability, or an <br />increased area of coverage. <br />Challenges /Risks: (not to exceed a % page) <br />Identify any potential challenges to implementing this project. Examples of challenges and risks could <br />include anything that could impact the schedule or cost, such as hiring an interoperability coordinator by a <br />certain date, collection of Memoranda of Understanding, or completion of a related project. <br />Project Budget: (not to exceed 1 page) <br />Explain how the costs were estimated and justify the need for the costs. The applicant should break down <br />the project budget by allowable cost category, and M &A, and the anticipated expenditures within each <br />category. For clarification, please list out anticipated expenditures under each allowable cost category and <br />M &A on separate lines. <br />Note: If the applicant is proposing a project for the purchase of interoperable emergency communications <br />equipment, the State or territory must include cost share information in the table below to demonstrate that it <br />is in compliance with the 25% State cost share requirement. The information should include: <br />• Amount of State (or local) cost share funding; <br />• Source of cost share funding (e.g., State, local); and <br />• Category of in -kind (e.g., donated volunteer services, salaries, equipment, or property or indirect <br />costs) and /or cash cost share (e.g., State, local). <br />47 <br />55A -53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.