Laserfiche WebLink
Area Emissions <br />Pollutant <br />Unmitigated <br />(Ibs /day) <br />SCAQMD <br />Threshold <br />ROG <br />28.39 <br />55 <br />Nox <br />15.82 <br />55 <br />Co <br />122,31 <br />550 <br />PM10 <br />22.96 <br />150 <br />Sot <br />0.14 <br />150 <br />PM7,5 <br />4.49 <br />55 <br />Coe <br />17,511.24 <br />NIA <br />Bald - underline indicates exceedance of SCAQMD Threshold. <br />The majority of emissions associated with Area and Operational Emissions are generally due to vehicle <br />exhaust emissions. All such emissions would be below the SCAQMD's significance thresholds. Therefore, <br />combined emissions for the project would be considered to have a less than significant impact on regional air <br />quality. <br />a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality attainment <br />plan or congestion management plan? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />The City requires projects to conform to population and traffic forecasts contained in the General Plan. <br />The SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) provides a basis for assessing air quality with <br />the SCAB and provides for pollutant control strategies. The AQMP is used in establishing the State <br />Implementation Plan (SIP) consistent with the requirements of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments <br />(CAAA). The SIP defines how the SCAB will achieve the federal ambient air quality standards. <br />Because the project is not projected to increase the population or traffic conditions beyond what is <br />forecast in the General Plan, regional emissions associated with the project are accounted for within the <br />AQMP and are, therefore, consistent with the AQMP. The project will not conflict with or obstruct <br />implementation of the air quality attainment plan or congestion management plan and no impact will <br />occur. <br />b) Would the project violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or <br />proposed air quality violation? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />As indicated above, the Air Quality Assessment concluded that the proposed modification to the <br />project as originally approved will not exceed air quality thresholds. However, the air quality analysis <br />in the EIR noted that construction activity impacts for the originally approved project will exceed <br />significance thresholds for RDG due to the application of architectural coatings. This was considered <br />an unmitigable impact and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted in 2005. The proposed <br />modification to the original project will not violate any stationary source air quality standards or <br />contribute to an existing or proposed air quality violation. Therefore, the FEIR remains adequate and <br />complete. <br />c) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which <br />the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard <br />(including releasing emission which exceeds quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? (No <br />Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />As identified in the FEIR, construction related emissions would exceed the applicable South Coast Air <br />Quality Management District thresholds. The air quality impacts from the project as originally <br />proposed, plus air quality impacts from related cumulative projects and buildout of the City's General <br />Plan, would contribute additional emissions, resulting in an impact that is significant and cannot be <br />MacArthur Place South EIR — 2011 Addendum 24 <br />