2011-022 - Addendum to the FInal Environmental Impact Report No. 2004-02

Home Browse Search

� Responses to Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance No Substantial New Change from Significant More Severe Previous Issues and Supporting information Sources Impact Impacts Analysis e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? � For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XIII. Population and Housing —Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and business) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIV. Public Services a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public service: Fire protection? El El z Police protection? El El z Schools? El El z Parks? El El z Other public facilities? El El z XV. Recreation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional Parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XVI. Transportation/Traffic —Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing tragic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? MacArthur Place South EIR — 2011 Addendum 56