Laserfiche WebLink
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />No Substantial <br />New <br />Change from <br />Significant <br />More Severe <br />Previous <br />Issues and Supporting Information Sources <br />Impact <br />Impacts <br />Analysis <br />d) <br />Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including <br />through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially <br />increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would <br />result in flooding on or off -site? <br />e) <br />Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of <br />existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial <br />additional sources of polluted run -off? <br />f} <br />Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? <br />El <br />0 <br />g) <br />Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal <br />Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br />delineation map? <br />h) <br />Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede <br />or redirect flood flows? <br />i) <br />Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death <br />involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or <br />dam. <br />j) <br />Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />X. Land Use and Planning — Would the project: <br />a) <br />Physically divide an established community? <br />b) <br />Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an <br />1:1 <br />agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the <br />general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) <br />adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? <br />c) <br />Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community <br />El <br />El <br />conservation plan? <br />Xl. Mineral Resources — Would the project: <br />a) <br />Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be <br />of value to the region and the residents of the state? <br />b) <br />Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource <br />El <br />El <br />recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land <br />use plan? <br />XII. Noise — Would the project result in: <br />a) <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards <br />established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable <br />standards of other agencies? <br />b) <br />Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration <br />El <br />or groundborne noise levels? <br />c) <br />A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project <br />vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />d) <br />A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the <br />project vicinity above levels existing without project? <br />MacArthur Place South EIR — 2011 Addendum <br />55 <br />