Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 2 CEQA Findings <br /> <br /> <br />Impact Statement <br /> <br />Evidence/Rationale Supporting Findings <br /> <br />Mitigation Measures <br /> <br />Findings Level of <br />Significance after <br />Mitigation <br /> cumulative basis would exceed additional mitigation. Specifically, the Agency <br /> thresholds. finds that no additional feasible mitigation <br /> measures exist that would avoid or <br /> substantially reduce this impact. Technology <br /> does not yet exist in an economical fashion that <br /> would allow common use of zero emission <br /> vehicles or combustible fuels that generate <br /> substantially fewer carbon atoms or other <br /> greenhouse gas-causing substances. <br />GROWTH INDUCEMENT <br />In general, a project may The proposed project includes potential No feasible mitigation measures exist that Finding 3 <br />foster spatial, economic, or change to a more mixed-use zoning would reduce this impact. The Agency finds that specific economic, <br />population growth in a designation. The proposed designations social, or other considerations make infeasible <br />geographic area if it meets would be generally consistent with the additional mitigation. Specifically, the Agency <br />any one of the criteria nature of on-site and surrounding finds that no feasible mitigation measures exist <br />identified below: development. Implementation of the that would avoid or substantially reduce the <br />¦ The project removes an amendments would allow for continued growth-inducing effect of the project. <br />impediment to growth use of industrial development, while also <br />(e.g., the establishment permitting mixed-use development to <br />of an essential public promote increased land use compatibility <br />service, or the provision with surrounding uses and a more transit- <br />of new access to an supportive environment. However, due to <br />area) the lack of an existing mixed-use land use <br />¦ The project results in the and/or zoning designation within the City, <br />urbanization of land in a the project would be considered growth <br />remote location (leapfrog inducing as a result of removing an <br />development) impediment to growth or establishing a <br /> precedent-setting action. <br />¦ The project establishes a <br />precedent-setting action <br />(e.g., a change in zoning <br />or general plan <br />amendment approval) <br />¦ Economic expansion or <br />2-54 Revised Station District Project and FOIL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations