Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 2 CEQA Findings <br />Table 2-1 CEQA Findings <br />Level of <br />Significance after <br />Impact Statement Evidence/Rationale Supporting Findings Mitigation Measures Findings Mitigation <br />shadowed) <br />Preexisting condition (shadow condition <br />¦ <br />due to existing buildings, landscaping, or <br />other features) <br />Type (solid or dappled shadow) <br />¦ <br />The report shall include any feasible design <br />considerations that would reduce the extent of <br />shadows cast by a proposed structure. The <br />analysis and the project design plans shall be <br />forwarded to the Planning and Building <br />Agency for review and approval. <br /> <br />Air Quality <br />Impact 4.2-5 Construction The City believes that the construction MM4.2-7 Project applicants shall require by Finding 1 Significant and <br />unavoidable <br />activities associated with the would generate air pollutant emissions, contract specifications that all diesel-powered <br />The City finds that changes or alterations have <br />construction of individual including CO, NO, and PM, for which equipment used will be retrofitted with after- <br />been required in, or incorporated into, the <br />X10 <br />projects within the Transit the Basin is currently in nonattainment. treatment products (e.g., engine catalysts) to <br />project which would avoid or substantially <br />Zoning Code area, including The City further believes that the the extent that they are readily available in the <br />lessen the significant environmental effect as <br />the Developer project, would implementation of MM4.2-7 through South Coast Air Basin. Contract specifications <br />identified in the final EIR. Specifically, MM4.2-7 <br />contribute substantially to an MM4.2-20 will reduce the emissions of shall be included in project construction <br />through MM4.2-20 will reduce project impacts <br />existing or projected air these pollutants but not a less than documents, which shall be reviewed by the <br />from the emission of air pollutants, although <br />significant level. <br />quality violation for criteria air City of Santa Ana prior to issuance of a <br />impacts will remain significant. <br />pollutants. grading permit. <br /> <br />Finding 3 <br />MM4.2-8 Project applicants shall require by <br />Discussion is provided on pages 4.3-3 <br />The City finds that specific economic, social, or <br />contract specifications that all heavy-duty <br />through 4.2-28 to 33 of the FEIR (Volume <br />other considerations make infeasible additional <br />diesel-powered equipment operating and <br />I). In addition, Appendix B provides further <br />mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible <br />refueling at the project site use low-NO <br />evidence supporting this impact and its <br />X <br />mitigation measures exist that would avoid or <br />diesel fuel to the extent that it is readily <br />associated findings. <br />substantially reduce this impact. <br />available and cost effective (up to 125 percent <br />of the cost of California Air Resources Board <br />diesel) in the South Coast Air Basin (this does <br />not apply to diesel-powered trucks traveling to <br />and from the project site). Contract <br />specifications shall be included in project <br />Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 2-5 <br /> <br />