My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-023 - Development Agreement Between the Community Redevelopment Agency
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2011
>
2011-023 - Development Agreement Between the Community Redevelopment Agency
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 4:16:00 PM
Creation date
5/4/2011 2:08:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2011-023
Date
4/18/2011
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 2 CEQA Findings <br />Table 2-1 CEQA Findings <br />Level of <br />Significance after <br />Impact Statement Evidence/Rationale Supporting Findings Mitigation Measures Findings Mitigation <br />provisions within the Transit Zoning Code technical report or memorandum. The project <br />design and development standards applicant shall be responsible for <br />requiring architectural compatibility, implementing methods for eliminating or <br />significant historical resources would be reducing impacts on historical resources <br />adversely impacted by future development identified in the technical report or <br />plans that would require demolition of memorandum. Such methods could include, <br />historic-age buildings and structures. but not be limited to, written and photographic <br />Therefore, impacts are considered recordation of the resource in accordance <br />significant and unavoidable. <br />with the level of Historic American Building <br />Survey (HABS) documentation that is <br />Discussion is provided on pages 4.4-22 <br />appropriate to the significance (local, state, <br />through 26 of the FEIR (Volume I). In <br />national) of the resource. <br />addition, Appendix D provides further <br />evidence supporting this impact and its <br />associated findings. <br />Cumulative Paleontological Summary: Because all cultural resources Refer to MM4.4-1(a), MM4.4-1(b), and Finding 1 Significant and <br />Impacts MM4.4-3, above. unavoidable <br />are unique and non-renewable members <br />The City finds that changes or alterations have <br />of finite classes, all adverse effects or <br />been required in, or incorporated into, the <br />negative impacts erode a dwindling <br />project which would avoid or substantially <br />resource base. <br />lessen the significant environmental effect as <br /> identified in the final EIR. <br />Discussion is provided on page 4.4-27 of Specifically, MM4.4-1(a), MM4.4-1(b), and <br />the FEIR (Volume I). <br />MM4.4-3, which would require the Project <br />Applicant to cease construction and consult <br />with a qualified professional in the event a <br />fossil or other cultural resource is found during <br />construction would reduce adverse impacts. <br />However, the loss of any one paleontological <br />site affects all others in a region because these <br />resources are best understood in the context of <br />the entirety of the ancient ecologic system of <br />which they formed a part. The boundaries of <br />paleontologically important sites are not limited <br />by property boundaries. In addition, since <br />historic features in their context are finite <br />2-24 Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.