Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 2 CEQA Findings <br />Table 2-1 CEQA Findings <br />Level of <br />Significance after <br />Impact Statement Evidence/Rationale Supporting Findings Mitigation Measures Findings Mitigation <br />resources, the loss of one structure diminishes <br />resources from the given context. <br />Finding 3 <br />Therefore, construction of the Proposed Project <br />despite mitigation, along with other projects in <br />the area could inadvertently impact previously <br />unknown or undiscovered cultural resources. <br />Therefore, this cumulative impact would remain <br />significant and unavoidable. The City finds that <br />specific economic, social, or other <br />considerations make infeasible additional <br />mitigation. <br />HHM <br />AZARDS AND AZARDOUS ATERIALS <br />Impact 4.5-2 Construction Future development under the project MM4.5-1 When sites that are listed in the Finding 1 Less than <br />significant <br />activities associated with would involve the transportation, use, EDR Report initiate project development, the <br />The City finds that changes or alterations have <br />implementation of the storage, and/or disposal of hazardous project applicant shall prepare a Phase I ESA <br />been required in, or incorporated into, the <br />proposed Transit Zoning materials, such as diesel exhaust. for the proposed site. The Phase I ESA shall <br />project which would avoid or substantially <br />Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) Construction activities on existing sites be prepared in accordance with ASTM E- <br />lessen the significant environmental effect as <br />would result in the release of documented as hazardous materials sites 1527-05 “Standard Practice for Environmental <br />identified in the final EIR. <br />hazardous materials to the or requiring demolition of structures built Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental <br />environment through prior to 1980 which may contain asbestos, Site Assessment Process” (November 1, <br />reasonably foreseeable upset lead or PCBs, would expose construction 2006). The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to <br />and accident conditions. <br />workers and the public to hazardous identify environmental conditions at a <br />materials. However, Federal, state, and proposed project site that may suggest <br />local regulations govern the disposal of environmental contamination. The Phase I <br />wastes identified as hazardous, which ESA report shall be prepared by a CA EPA <br />would be produced at future development Registered Environmental Assessor or <br />sites. Asbestos, lead, or other hazardous similarly qualified individual prior to initiating <br />any construction activities at the site. <br />material encountered during demolition or <br />construction activities would be disposed <br />If recommended in the Phase I ESA, the <br />of in compliance with all applicable <br />project sponsor shall undertake (or require <br />regulations for the handling of such waste. <br />the responsible party to undertake) a Phase II <br />In addition, implementation of MM4.5-1 <br />ESA soil sampling plan; or if any <br />through MM4.5-3 would reduce these <br />environmental contamination is identified by <br />Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 2-25 <br /> <br />