Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 2 CEQA Findings <br />Table 2-1 CEQA Findings <br />Level of <br />Significance after <br />Impact Statement Evidence/Rationale Supporting Findings Mitigation Measures Findings Mitigation <br />the increasing demand for energy and natural <br />gas. <br />MM4.13-22 Project applicants shall, where <br />feasible, incorporate passive solar design <br />features into the buildings, which may include <br />roof overhangs or canopies that block <br />summer shade, but that allow winter sun, <br />from penetrating south facing windows. <br />MM4.13-23 Use Energy Efficient Roofing <br />Materials. All roofing materials used in <br />commercial/retail buildings at the Mixed-Use <br />Retail Development shall be Energy Star® <br />certified. All roof products shall also be <br />certified to meet American Society for Testing <br />and Materials (ASTM) high emissivity <br />requirements. <br />MM4.13-24 All commercial/industrial projects <br />shall, where feasible, include up to 10% <br />renewable energy sources within the project. <br />Impact 4.13-2 Long-term Based on a threshold of 30% reduction in MM4.13-1 through MM4.13-24 would also Finding 1 Significant and <br />apply to this impact. unavoidable <br />cumulative development greenhouse gas emissions over “business <br />The City finds that changes or alterations have <br />pursuant to the Transit as usual,” the Project as a whole had <br />been required in, or incorporated into, the <br />Zoning Code at full build-out significant impacts for operational <br />project which would avoid or substantially <br />has the potential to conflict emissions due to the size of the Transit <br />lessen the significant environmental effect as <br />with AB 32. The Project as a Zoning Code area. While implementation <br />identified in the final EIR. <br />whole is significant for of mitigation measures MM4.13-1 through <br />Finding 3 <br />operational emissions due to MM4.13-7 would reduce construction- <br />The City finds that specific economic, social, or <br />the size of the Transit Zoning related and operational emissions on a <br />other considerations make infeasible additional <br />Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) project level basis, in the long-term <br />mitigation. Specifically, the City finds that no <br />area. <br />cumulative basis would exceed <br />additional feasible mitigation measures exist <br />thresholds. <br />that would avoid or substantially reduce this <br />impact. Technology does not yet exist in an <br />economical fashion that would allow common <br />Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 2-53 <br /> <br />