My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-023 - Development Agreement Between the Community Redevelopment Agency
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2011
>
2011-023 - Development Agreement Between the Community Redevelopment Agency
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 4:16:00 PM
Creation date
5/4/2011 2:08:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2011-023
Date
4/18/2011
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 2 CEQA Findings <br />Table 2-1 CEQA Findings <br />Level of <br />Significance after <br />Impact Statement Evidence/Rationale Supporting Findings Mitigation Measures Findings Mitigation <br />use of zero emission vehicles or combustible <br />fuels that generate substantially fewer carbon <br />atoms or other greenhouse gas-causing <br />substances. <br />GI <br />ROWTH NDUCEMENT <br />In general, a project may The proposed project includes potential No feasible mitigation measures exist that Finding 3 <br />would reduce this impact. <br />foster spatial, economic, or change to a more mixed-use zoning <br />The City finds that specific economic, social, or <br />population growth in a designation. The proposed designations <br />other considerations make infeasible additional <br />geographic area if it meets would be generally consistent with the <br />mitigation. Specifically, the City finds that no <br />any one of the criteria nature of on-site and surrounding <br />feasible mitigation measures exist that would <br />identified below: <br />development. Implementation of the <br />avoid or substantially reduce the growth- <br />amendments would allow for continued <br />inducing effect of the project. <br />The project removes an <br />¦ <br />use of industrial development, while also <br />impediment to growth <br />permitting mixed-use development to <br />(e.g., the establishment <br />promote increased land use compatibility <br />of an essential public <br />with surrounding uses and a more transit- <br />service, or the provision <br />supportive environment. However, due to <br />of new access to an <br />the lack of an existing mixed-use land use <br />area) <br />and/or zoning designation within the City, <br />The project results in the <br />¦ <br />the project would be considered growth <br />urbanization of land in a <br />inducing as a result of removing an <br />remote location (leapfrog <br />impediment to growth or establishing a <br />development) <br />precedent-setting action. <br />The project establishes a <br />¦ <br />precedent-setting action <br />(e.g., a change in zoning <br />or general plan <br />amendment approval) <br />Economic expansion or <br />¦ <br />growth occurs in an area <br />in response to the project <br />(e.g., changes in revenue <br />base, employment <br />expansion, etc.) <br />2-54 Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.