My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-023 - Development Agreement Between the Community Redevelopment Agency
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2011
>
2011-023 - Development Agreement Between the Community Redevelopment Agency
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 4:16:00 PM
Creation date
5/4/2011 2:08:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2011-023
Date
4/18/2011
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives <br />viability, LE-4.3, 4.4, and 4.5, which support the goal of protecting and enhancing developments sites <br />and districts which are unique community assets that enhance the quality of life, or LE-5.1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.7, <br />5.9, 5.10, and 5.11, which ensure that the impacts of development are mitigated to the same extent as the <br />proposed Transit Zoning Code. (See Land Use Element; Draft EIR Table 4.7-3.) Similarly, it would not <br />further the goals of the Urban Design Element (Goals 1-7) to the same extent as the proposed Transit <br />Zoning Code. (See Urban Design Element; Draft EIR Table 4.7-3.) Moreover, the integrated and <br />cohesive development standards that are proposed for the Transit Zoning Code area would not be <br />implemented. <br />Lastly, Alternative 1 would increase impacts on transportation as a result of lack of emphasis on <br />alternative modes of transportation in the current General Plan and zoning designations and the lack of a <br />development framework to support transit-oriented development. For these reasons, the City rejects <br />Alternative 1 as infeasible. <br />Alternative 2: Overall Reduced Density <br /> <br />? <br />The Overall Reduced Density Alternative would reduce the intensity of all anticipated land uses within <br />the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area by 25 percent. In general, this alternative would <br />reduce the number of residences, including affordable housing, and reduce employment opportunities as <br />a result of less commercial uses in the area. Specifically, this alternative would result in approximately <br />1,019 fewer residential units, and 96,750 fewer square feet of retail within the Transit Zoning Code <br />(SD 84A and SD 84B) area. Specific development characteristics that would be allowed under this <br />alternative relative to the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) are specified in Table 3-1 <br />(Alternative 2 and Proposed Transit Zoning Code [SD 84A and SD 84B] Characteristics). <br /> <br />Table 3-1 Alternative 2 and Proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) <br /> <br />Characteristics <br />Land Use Type Alternative 2 Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) Difference <br />Residential (units) 3,0564,075 (1,019) <br /> <br />Retail (sf) 290,250387,000(96,750) <br /> <br />Industrial (sf) (990,000)(990,000)0 <br /> <br />Commercial (sf) (124,000) (124,000)0 <br /> <br />Civic (sf) (21,000)(21,000)0 <br /> <br />Green (sf) 680,000680,000 0 <br /> <br />Parking (1,772,000) (1,772,000)0 <br /> <br />SOURCE: PBS&J 2010 <br /> <br />Findings <br />The City hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make <br />the adoption of this alternative infeasible. <br />Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding <br />3-4 <br />Considerations <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.