Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives <br />Although Alternative 2 would somewhat reduce the significant impacts of the proposed Transit Zoning <br />Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) on aesthetics, climate change, and transportation, it would not reduce any of <br />those impacts to below the level of significance. In addition, Alternative 2 would not meet the housing <br />and transit objectives of the Project to the same extent as the proposed project. <br />Alternative 2 would reduce housing by 25 percent, from 4,075 to 3,056 residential units. The potential <br />number of affordable housing units would also be reduced by 25 percent. Providing 3,056 new units <br />would not meet Santa Ana’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment for 2006-2014, which calls for 3,393 <br />total units, 1,248 of which must be affordable for low, very low, and extremely low income households. <br />The City of Santa Ana has a great need for affordable housing; sixty percent of the households in Santa <br />Ana have low, very low, and extremely low income. (City of Santa Ana General Plan Draft Housing <br />Element 2006-2014, Appendix A, p. A-10.) Goal 2 of the Housing Element is to “provide a diversity of <br />quality housing, affordability levels, and living experiences that accommodate Santa Ana’s residents and <br />workforce of all household types, income levels, and age groups to foster an inclusive community.” <br />Alternative 2 would not meet this goal, or the following Housing Element policies, to the same extent as <br />the proposed project: <br />HE-2.3 Rental Housing. Encourage the construction of rental housing for Santa Ana’s <br />residents and workforce, including a commitment to very low, low, and moderate <br />income residents and moderate income Santa Ana workers. <br />HE-2.4 Diversity of Housing Types. Facilitate and encourage a diversity and range in types, <br />prices, and sizes of housing, including single family homes, apartments, town <br />homes, mixed/multiuse housing, transit-oriented developments, and live/work <br />housing. <br />Alternative 2 would not meet the project’s transit oriented objectives to the same extent as the proposed <br />project. Reducing the amount of housing and retail space would result in a failure to fully emphasize the <br />use of the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) for City residents. A mixed-use urban <br />and transit-oriented neighborhood requires a critical mass and balance between residential and non- <br />residential uses in order to succeed. (Draft EIR, Section 5.5.) Alternative 2 would not provide that critical <br />mass and balance. <br />In addition, it would not implement established SCAG RTP or RCP policies, or General Plan Land Use <br />Element policies 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.9, 2.4, 2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.7, 5.9, 5.10, <br />and 5.11, or Urban Land Use Element Goals 1 through 7 to the same extent as the proposed project. <br />(See Land Use Element; Urban Design Element; Draft EIR Table 4.7-3.) Specifically, the Alternative 2 <br />would not meet the following SCAG RTP Land Use Goals to the same extent as the proposed project: <br /> <br />¦ <br />Create mixed-use districts or “complete communities” in strategic growth areas through a <br />concentration of activities with housing, employment, and a mix of retail and services, located in <br />close proximity to each other. Focusing a mix of land uses in strategic growth areas creates <br />complete communities wherein most daily needs can be met within a short distance of home, <br />providing residents with the opportunity to patronize their local area and run daily errands by <br />walking or cycling rather traveling by automobile. <br /> <br />¦ <br />Intensify nodes along corridors with people-scaled, mixed-use developments. Many existing <br />corridors lack the residential and commercial concentration to adequately support non-auto transit <br />Revised Station District Project and FOL Settlement Agreement Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding <br />3-5 <br />Considerations <br /> <br />