Laserfiche WebLink
the 4 buildings, 3 were identified as contributors to a potentia[ historic district an the GOD block of <br /> East Sixth Street ~CHR status code 3CD~, and the fourth was identified as individually eligible far <br /> listing in the CRHR ~CHR status cads 3CS~. The rerr~ainder of the properties evaluated in this study <br /> were found ineligible far the NRHP, CRHR, and SARHP through survey evaluation ~CHR status code <br /> GZ~. <br /> Sapphos Enviro?~rnen~al, Inc., I~ernorandurr~ for the Record Ala 4: Po~en~ial ~.is~ings in ~1ae Santa <br /> Ana Register of Historical Properties toca~ed in the Renaissance Specific Plan Area ~2007~ <br /> In 2407, Sapphos Environmental, Inc. evaluated 34 specific properties targeted by the City of santa <br /> Ana located in the Renaissance Specific Plan area for eligibility for inclusion in the sARHP. Based an <br /> a preliminary review of photographs dated February 2043 and building permit data, Sapphos <br /> Environmental, Inc. concluded that 22 properties appeared to meet the criteria for inclusion and <br /> categorization in the SARHP, and S properties did not meet the criteria. Ten of the evaluated <br /> properties are located within the Station District Table 5.2,2-1~; S of the 10 were found to be <br /> potential historic resources, and 2 were deemed not significant. Two of the ~ potentially eligible <br /> properties are among the 23 buildings currently under consideration. <br /> Sapphos Environmren~al, inc., Resu?l~s of Lacy Windshield Survey ~ZOO~j <br /> As part of the City of Santa Ana's ongoing efforts to identify properties eligible to the SARHP in each <br /> of the City's recognized neighborhoods, Sapphos Environmental, Inc. conducted a windshield survey <br /> of the Lacy neighborhood. As a result, 14 properties were identified, 1O of which are in the Station <br /> District. Four of the 1 D are among the 23 buildings currently under consideration. <br /> 5.~ AS~~S~MNTS ~F INC~IVIdUAI SIGNIFICANCE ~F ~3 ~UILDINCS <br /> This section provides a summary assessment for each of the 23 buildings under consideration Table <br /> 5.3-1, jr~divia~ual,~ssessments of Significance}. ~f the 23 buildings, 7 were identified as historical <br /> resources as defined by CEC~A through eligibility for listing on the NRHP, CRHR, or SARHP, while <br /> 1 G were evaluated as ineligible far listing and thus did not qualify as historical resources. Cif the 7 <br /> eligible properties, 1 appears to be eligible for listing in the NRHP and the CRHR and 1 appears <br /> eligible far listing in the CRHR; both properties are ar would be categorized as "Key" in the SARHP, <br /> The remaining appeared eligible for the sARHP within the "Contributive" category but did not <br /> appear eligible far listing in the NRHP or CRHR, <br /> <br /> Sta~ron Distrir:t „~°'r°~~~~~ Nrstoric~~,~~ssessrnerrt <br /> day b, 2x11 ~r Sa~p~os Fr~v~rc~:~~~~~r~tal,lne. <br /> W. IPRUJ~CT~R ~ ~ G~ X71-Oa7lDocumentslHlstorrcal Assessmenr~Frr~all5 Results. DoC ~ ~ P~~~~;~e 5-1 ~ <br /> <br />