My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04 - Contract - Interior Demolition Inc - 8 Properties
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Successor Agency (Formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) (1974-Present)
>
COMMUNITY REDEVLOPMENT AGENCY(1974-2012)
>
2010-2012
>
2011
>
05/16/2011
>
04 - Contract - Interior Demolition Inc - 8 Properties
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:32:29 PM
Creation date
5/16/2011 9:27:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
04
Date
5/16/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.3.4 ~~o East 5ix~h street <br /> The residence at 72a fast Sixth Street is a significant historical resource. It appears individually <br /> eligible for inclusion in the SARHP under Criterion 1 as a building with the distinguishing <br /> characteristics of an architectural style ar period that exemplify a particular architectural style ar <br /> design features. Constructed circa ~ 908, it is an example of aturn-af-the-twentieth-century Colonial <br /> Revival cottage. Character-defining features of this property include one-scary height; squared plan; <br /> hipped roof; boxed eaves; lap siding trimmed by endboards and a frieze board; L-shaped parch <br /> with Tuscan columns used as porch roof supports; window and door surrounds with molded <br /> lintels; a highly decorative entry char in the east leg of the parch, featuring a broken pediment aver <br /> a window and embellished recessed panels; and art stone foundation. A front gable over the west <br /> section of the facade with a molded raking cornice and fishscale shingled gable end suggest the <br /> continuing influence of the Cueen Anne style. The recommended categorization would be <br /> "Contributive" because the building contributes to the overall character and history of a <br /> neighborhood or district and is a goad example of period architecture. The property does not <br /> illustrate the class of resource sufficiently to warrant eligibility for inclusion in the NRHP or the <br /> CRHR under Criterion C13. The building has experienced relatively minor alterations to the <br /> exterior, including the replacement of the porch steps and enclosure of a window, and retains <br /> integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship, and feeling. <br /> The property is not significant under NRHPICRHR Criteria AI1, 812, or D14 or under SARHP <br /> Criteria 2, 3, 4, 5, or Historical research has not located any information regarding the historical <br /> associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of Santa Ana. <br /> Na associations with important events; famous people; original settlers; renowned organizations ar <br /> businesses; or important centers far political, social, economic, or cultural activity in the City of <br /> Santa Ana were identified at this property. Constructed circa 19aS, the building was not present <br /> when the City of Santa Ana was founded in 189. The property, constructed as asingle-family <br /> residence, is an example of residential development in the Lacy neighborhood from 1 S95 to 193a <br /> when single-family residences and duplexes were the predominant property types in the area. Na <br /> persons are known to have made significant contributions to the history of the City of Santa Ana <br /> while living at this address. The building is not associated with the work of a Hatable architect, <br /> builder, ar designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana or at <br /> 1 arge. <br /> 5.3. ~ 5 9 ~ ~ Brown street <br /> The residence at 911 grown Street does Hat appear eligible for the NRHP, the CRHR, or the <br /> SARHP under any criteria and is therefore Hat a historical resource, Constructed circa 1945, this <br /> one-story, single-family residence influenced by the Minimal Traditional style was moved to its <br /> current location in the Lacy neighborhood in 1984, replacing an alder residence that had been <br /> demolished, it therefore has no historical linkage with the development of the neighborhood <br /> between 1895 and 1930. Historical research has not located any information regarding the <br /> historical associations of the building as significant to the history and development of the City of <br /> Santa Ana. The building is a common, undistinguished example of its type and does not convey <br /> architectural significance as an example of an architectural style or period, or exemplify a style or <br /> design features. The building is not associated with the work of a notable architect, builder, or <br /> designer whose style influenced architectural development in the City of Santa Ana ar at large. The <br /> building's original design and materials are relatively intact, but it does Hat possess integrity of <br /> location, setting, feeling, ar association. <br /> <br /> station ~lstrict Project Nr'storr'cal Assessment <br /> inlay G, 20 ~ ~ Sapphas Fnvironmental,lnc. <br /> ~N: IPRUJCTSI 14~ 1 ~ 1471-007~Documer~ts~Nistorical Assessrnent4Finall5 Results. Dc Page 5-19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.