My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - CUP - 516 S SANTA FE ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
11/07/2011
>
31A - CUP - 516 S SANTA FE ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:38:33 PM
Creation date
11/3/2011 1:00:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
31A
Date
11/7/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I (g) BENDER READY-MIX CONCRETE MANUFACTURING PROJECT <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />1 4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br /> <br /> <br />J <br /> <br /> <br />t <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Less Than <br />Potentially <br />Would the project:` Significant Less Than <br />No <br />Significant With <br />Impact Significant Impact' <br />Impact Midgatlon Impact <br /> incorporated <br />a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse <br />effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involvin : <br />1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on <br />the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning <br />Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based ? <br />on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br />Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. <br />2) Strong seismic round shaking? ? <br />3) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ? <br />4) Landslides? ? <br />b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ? <br />c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that <br />would become unstable as a result of the project, and ? <br />potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, <br />subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? <br />d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of <br />the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks ? <br />to life or property? <br />e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of <br />septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems ? <br />where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste <br />water? <br />a) Expose people or stnrctures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, <br />injury, or death involving: <br />1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other <br />substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special <br />Publication 4Z <br />No Impact. Southern California, including the project area, is subject to the effects of seismic activity <br />due to the active faults that traverse the area. Active faults are defined as those that have experienced <br />surface displacement within Holocene time (approximately the last 11,000 years) and/or are in a State- <br />designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. <br />According to the Seismic Safety Element of the City's General Plan, no faults (active, potentially active, <br />or inactive) are known to exist within the City. Since no known faults exist in the site vicinity and the <br />site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, impacts would not occur in this <br />regard. <br />Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. <br />JULY 2011 4.6-1 GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br />31A-51
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.